Inter-Document Relevance Modeling : Analyzes Cross-Document

SUPERCHARGE YOUR ONLINE VISIBILITY! CONTACT US AND LET’S ACHIEVE EXCELLENCE TOGETHER!

This project focuses on analyzing the semantic relationships between multiple documents to identify and rank related content across them. By leveraging sentence embeddings and similarity metrics, the system computes overall relevance scores that quantify how closely two documents relate in terms of their textual content. Additionally, the project provides actionable internal linking suggestions by identifying contextually appropriate anchor sentences within source documents that can link to relevant target documents. These recommendations support improved content interlinking strategies, which can enhance site navigation, search engine optimization (SEO), and user experience.

The implementation incorporates state-of-the-art embedding models for text representation, combined with cosine similarity and heuristic scoring methods to ensure both accuracy and contextual relevance. Output results are formatted for straightforward integration, including CSV exports of similarity scores and detailed linking suggestions for ease of client use.

Project Purpose

The primary purpose of this project is to facilitate intelligent internal content linking through an automated, data-driven approach. By uncovering hidden semantic connections between documents, the solution enables:

Enhanced discoverability of related content within a website or document repository.
Improved SEO performance by creating meaningful internal links that search engines can follow.
Better user engagement by providing readers with relevant, contextually linked resources.
Efficient content management and optimization without manual review of all documents.

The project delivers a scalable framework for organizations to analyze their content collections, identify opportunities for internal linking, and apply recommendations in a systematic manner, driving both operational efficiency and digital marketing effectiveness.

Project Explanation

Inter-Document Relevance

This project centers on the concept of Inter-Document Relevance, which refers to the measurement of how closely two or more documents relate to each other based on their content. Instead of treating documents as isolated entities, the project analyzes the semantic connections across multiple documents, allowing for a deeper understanding of their relationships.

Cross-document relationships

Cross-document relationships describe these connections between documents that may share similar topics, themes, or information, even if they do not explicitly reference one another. By identifying these relationships, it becomes possible to:

Rank related content according to their degree of relevance, facilitating targeted recommendations.
Detect contextual overlaps that can improve content linking strategies.
Support content discovery by highlighting documents that complement or expand upon each other’s topics.

The approach uses advanced text embedding techniques to transform documents into vector representations, capturing the meaning and context of the text. Similarity between these vectors is then calculated to quantify relevance, enabling objective and scalable analysis.

Ultimately, this project provides a mechanism to systematically analyze and leverage inter-document semantic relationships, which is crucial for optimizing internal linking, improving navigation, and enhancing the overall value of a content ecosystem.

What is the main goal of this project?

The primary objective is to analyze the semantic relationships between multiple documents to quantify their relevance to each other. This analysis enables identifying which pieces of content are closely related, thereby facilitating informed decisions around content organization, internal linking strategies, and improving user navigation across a content ecosystem.

Why is understanding inter-document relationships important for a website or digital platform?

Understanding how documents relate to one another is essential for creating a coherent and navigable content structure. It supports the development of logical internal linking paths, which enhances user experience by guiding visitors to relevant and complementary content seamlessly. Additionally, it helps in maintaining consistency in messaging and topic coverage across the platform, preventing content silos and redundancy.

How does this project contribute to SEO (Search Engine Optimization)?

In the SEO domain, internal linking plays a crucial role in distributing page authority, improving crawl efficiency, and signaling content relevance to search engines. This project identifies the most contextually relevant internal linking opportunities by analyzing semantic similarity between documents. Implementing these recommendations helps search engines better understand the site’s topical structure and relevance hierarchy, ultimately supporting higher rankings and improved organic traffic.

How does the analysis differ from traditional keyword matching or simple link audits?

Unlike traditional methods that rely heavily on exact keyword matches or manual audits, this project employs semantic analysis techniques. It captures deeper contextual relationships between documents, allowing for the discovery of relevant connections even when different words or phrases describe similar concepts. This results in a more robust and meaningful understanding of content relationships.

Can this project help in identifying content gaps or opportunities?

Certainly. By mapping relationships and similarities among existing documents, it becomes easier to spot thematic areas that are underrepresented or disconnected. This insight supports strategic content creation by highlighting gaps where new, relevant content would strengthen the overall content network.

Libraries Used

· numpy
A fundamental package for scientific computing with Python, numpy provides efficient handling of large numerical arrays and matrices.

In this project, it supports performing mathematical operations needed for similarity calculations and managing embedding vectors effectively.

· nltk (Natural Language Toolkit)
nltk is a comprehensive library for natural language processing tasks. It offers tokenization, tagging, parsing, and semantic reasoning tools.

This project uses nltk primarily for sentence tokenization, which breaks down large text blocks into individual sentences, enabling detailed semantic comparison and accurate anchor sentence identification for internal linking.

· re (Regular Expressions)
The re module allows for pattern matching and string manipulation through regular expressions.

Within this project, it is used to detect and filter out generic or non-informative anchor phrases (such as “Step 1:”, “Introduction:”), ensuring that recommended internal links are relevant and meaningful.

· requests
The requests library provides a simple API to make HTTP requests.

It is used here to dynamically retrieve the HTML content of web pages, allowing the system to work with live URLs and extract up-to-date content for relevance analysis.

· BeautifulSoup (bs4)
BeautifulSoup is a parsing library designed to extract structured data from HTML and XML documents.

It is critical for navigating the HTML structure of retrieved web pages and extracting text content from specific tags such as paragraphs (<p>) and list items (<li>), which form the basis of the semantic analysis.

· sentence_transformers (SentenceTransformer)
This library provides access to state-of-the-art transformer models that convert sentences into dense vector embeddings capturing their semantic meaning.

It forms the core of the project’s semantic similarity modeling by enabling comparison of content meaning across documents beyond simple keyword matching, thus supporting effective inter-document relevance analysis.

· nltk.download(‘punkt’)
Downloads the pre-trained Punkt sentence tokenizer models, necessary to enable nltk’s sentence tokenization functionality used extensively in text preprocessing.

· nltk.download(‘punkt_tab’)
An additional resource for enhanced tokenization capabilities, providing extended or customized tokenization models that improve sentence boundary detection accuracy, especially in diverse or complex texts.

These libraries collectively enable the full pipeline of this project—from retrieving and parsing web content to preprocessing text, generating semantic embeddings, calculating inter-document similarities, and producing meaningful internal link suggestions. Their integration ensures that the solution is both robust and scalable across varied web content.

Function extract_structured_blocks: Content Extraction

This function is responsible for retrieving and structuring meaningful textual content from a webpage given its URL. It performs an HTTP GET request to fetch the raw HTML content, then parses the HTML to extract text from specific tags that usually contain important information, such as headings (h1, h2, h3), paragraphs (p), and list items (li). Non-content elements like headers, footers, navigation menus, scripts, and styles are explicitly removed to reduce noise.

The function also extracts page-level metadata like the title and the meta description, which can provide valuable contextual information about the page. The text blocks are filtered to include only those with a minimum length to ensure relevance and usability for subsequent semantic processing.

The output is a structured list of text blocks, each annotated with its HTML tag and position index, alongside the title and meta description of the page. This structured output is fundamental to enabling fine-grained semantic comparison across documents.

Code Highlights

URL Validation:

if not isinstance(url, str) or not url.startswith((‘http://’, ‘https://’)): raise ValueError(“Invalid URL format.”)

Ensures the input is a valid URL beginning with “http://” or “https://”, which prevents attempts to fetch invalid resources.

Removing Non-Content Tags:

for tag in soup([‘header’, ‘footer’, ‘nav’, ‘aside’, ‘form’, ‘script’, ‘style’]): tag.decompose()

This step removes HTML elements unlikely to contain meaningful content for semantic analysis (e.g., navigation bars, scripts). It helps focus the extraction on relevant textual data.

Filtering and Structuring Content Blocks: if text and len(text.split()) > 5: content_blocks.append({ “text”: text, “tag”: tag.name, “block_index”: block_index })

Only text blocks with more than five words are considered, reducing noise from short or irrelevant snippets. Each block is saved with its text, tag name, and position index to maintain structural context.

Text Preprocessing: preprocess_blocks Function

The preprocess_blocks function performs essential text cleaning and filtering on the extracted content blocks to prepare the text for further semantic analysis and relevance modeling. The goal is to remove generic, boilerplate, or promotional sentences that do not contribute meaningfully to the inter-document relevance assessment.

Code Highlights

text = re.sub(r’\s+’, ‘ ‘, block[“text”]).strip()

This line normalizes whitespace within the block text, converting multiple spaces, tabs, and newlines into a single space and trimming leading/trailing spaces.

sentences = sent_tokenize(text)

Sentence tokenization breaks down the block text into manageable units for semantic comparison.

if len(clean_sent.split()) >= 5 and not any(phrase in clean_sent for phrase in generic_phrases):

This condition filters out very short sentences and sentences containing generic, low-value phrases to ensure only meaningful content is retained.

processed_sentences.append({ “sentence”: clean_sent, “block_index”: block[“block_index”], “tag”: block[“tag”] })

Retains sentence-level content along with positional and structural metadata for downstream relevance modeling and internal linking.

Model Loading: load_model Function

The load_model function is responsible for initializing and loading the sentence embedding model used throughout the project for semantic similarity computations.

The default model used is “sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2”, a compact and efficient model known for strong performance on semantic textual similarity tasks with low latency, making it suitable for scalable inter-document analysis.

The function loads a pretrained SentenceTransformer model, which converts sentences into dense vector embeddings. These embeddings capture semantic meaning and contextual relationships within text.

Code Highlights

model = SentenceTransformer(model_name)

This line creates an instance of the SentenceTransformer model based on the provided model name. The model encapsulates the architecture and pretrained weights needed for embedding generation.

Model Explanation: SentenceTransformer (all-MiniLM-L6-v2)

The core of this project’s semantic understanding capability relies on the SentenceTransformer model, specifically the all-MiniLM-L6-v2 variant. This model is a state-of-the-art transformer-based architecture designed to generate meaningful vector representations (embeddings) of sentences or text blocks. These embeddings capture the semantic essence of text beyond mere keyword matching, which is crucial for analyzing relationships between different documents.

Description of the Model

Transformer Architecture:

The backbone of this model is a transformer, specifically a BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) model. Transformers use self-attention mechanisms to analyze the context of each word within a sentence by looking at surrounding words bidirectionally. This contextual understanding helps the model grasp nuances, such as polysemy (words with multiple meanings), idiomatic expressions, and sentence structure, which simpler models often miss.

Sequence Length Handling:

The model processes sequences up to 256 tokens long, which allows it to cover most sentences and small paragraphs efficiently without truncation.

Pooling Layer:

After encoding individual tokens, the model applies mean pooling over all token embeddings. This pooling converts the variable-length token embeddings into a fixed-size vector that represents the entire sentence or text block’s semantic meaning. Mean pooling averages the information from all tokens, ensuring a balanced representation that is sensitive to the entire input context.

Normalization Layer:

The pooled embeddings are normalized to unit length, facilitating consistent and reliable similarity calculations using cosine similarity. Normalization is critical because it stabilizes the vector space and improves comparison accuracy.

Embedding Size:

The resulting embeddings have a dimension of 384, striking a balance between detailed representation and computational efficiency.

Why this Model is Suitable for Inter-Document Relevance Modeling

Semantic Precision:

It captures the meaning of text fragments deeply, which is essential when comparing diverse documents that may use different wording to express similar ideas.

Efficiency and Speed:

With only 6 transformer layers (hence ‘L6’), the model is lighter and faster than larger counterparts, making it practical for processing multiple documents and many text blocks without excessive computational cost.

Proven Performance:

This model has been benchmarked extensively and shows strong performance on tasks such as semantic textual similarity, clustering, and search, all relevant to the goals of this project.

How does this model enhance SEO-related tasks?

SEO often depends on understanding and leveraging content relationships, relevance, and user intent. This model helps by providing precise semantic embeddings that detect how closely related different content pieces are, regardless of exact wording. It supports identifying the most relevant internal links, improving site navigation, and optimizing content structure, which in turn enhances user experience and search engine rankings.

Document Embedding Calculation: get_document_embedding

This function calculates a single, unified embedding vector that represents the overall semantic content of a document. The document is represented as a collection of preprocessed sentences, and the goal is to aggregate their meanings into one fixed-size vector suitable for similarity comparisons.

Explanation

The process begins by checking if the input sentence list is empty. An empty list means no meaningful content is available for embedding, so a zero vector is returned. This zero vector matches the model’s embedding dimension, ensuring compatibility with downstream similarity computations.

For non-empty input, the function extracts the raw sentence texts from the sentence dictionaries. These texts are then passed to the pre-loaded SentenceTransformer model to obtain sentence-level embeddings. The model returns an array where each row corresponds to the semantic vector of a sentence.

The key step is the aggregation of these sentence embeddings. The function uses mean pooling across all sentence vectors, resulting in a single embedding that represents the entire document’s semantic footprint. This aggregation smooths out individual sentence variations and highlights the dominant themes of the document.

The resulting vector serves as a concise, yet rich semantic signature of the document, which is essential for accurate inter-document similarity assessments.

Code Highlights

if not sentences:

Guards against empty input by returning a zero vector of the correct dimension, preventing errors in similarity calculations later.

sentence_embeddings = model.encode(sentence_texts, convert_to_numpy=True)

Utilizes the SentenceTransformer model’s batch encoding functionality to efficiently convert sentences to numerical embeddings.

doc_embedding = np.mean(sentence_embeddings, axis=0)

Computes the mean vector over all sentence embeddings, creating a stable and representative document embedding.

Document Embedding Pipeline: embed_documents

This function orchestrates the entire process of extracting, preprocessing, and embedding a list of documents identified by their URLs. It serves as a centralized pipeline that transforms raw web content into meaningful semantic representations that can be used for similarity comparisons and further analysis.

Explanation

For each URL in the provided list, the function performs a series of steps:

Content Extraction:

The raw HTML content of the page is parsed to extract structured text blocks such as paragraphs, headings, and list items. This is done using the extract_structured_blocks function. The function also retrieves important metadata such as the page title and meta description.

Text Preprocessing:

The extracted blocks undergo cleaning and filtering to remove generic phrases and overly short sentences. This prepares the text for embedding by isolating semantically meaningful sentences. The preprocess_blocks function performs this operation.

Document Embedding Generation:

The cleaned sentences are converted into a single vector representation by averaging the sentence embeddings obtained from the SentenceTransformer model. This embedding captures the overall meaning of the document and is created by the get_document_embedding function.

Throughout the iteration, three dictionaries are populated:

doc_vectors: Maps each URL to its corresponding semantic embedding vector.

sentence_data: Stores the processed sentences for each URL, which are useful for further detailed analysis or link suggestion.

metadata: Keeps the document’s title, meta description, and raw content blocks, which support contextual understanding and reporting.

This modular and systematic approach ensures the data is well-organized and ready for subsequent relevance modeling and internal linking tasks.

Code Highlights

blocks, title, meta = extract_structured_blocks(url)

Retrieves structured textual content and metadata from the raw HTML of each URL.

processed = preprocess_blocks(blocks)

Cleans and segments content into meaningful sentences for embedding.

embedding = get_document_embedding(processed, model)

Generates a compact semantic representation for the entire document.

Dictionaries doc_vectors, sentence_data, and metadata are updated iteratively, preserving different granularities of data for flexible usage.

Pairwise Document Similarity Calculation: compute_similarity_matrix

This function computes the pairwise semantic similarity between all documents represented by their embedding vectors. The similarity matrix produced provides a quantitative measure of how closely related each pair of documents is, based on their content semantics.

Explanation

Input:

A dictionary mapping document URLs to their respective embedding vectors (doc_vectors). These embeddings capture the overall meaning of each document.

Process:

The function extracts the list of URLs and stacks their embedding vectors into a single NumPy array to facilitate vectorized operations.
It applies cosine similarity, a standard metric for measuring the angular similarity between two vectors, which ranges from -1 (completely opposite) to 1 (identical).
The output similarity values form a square matrix where each cell [i, j] represents the similarity score between document i and document j.

Output:

A Pandas DataFrame (sim_df) that neatly organizes these similarity scores with URLs as both row indices and column headers. This tabular format is intuitive for analysis, reporting, and further processing.

Importance in the Project

This matrix forms the foundation for relevance modeling by quantifying relationships across all documents.
It enables identifying the closest related content to a target document, which is crucial for tasks like internal linking suggestions and content optimization.
Cosine similarity is widely used in natural language processing due to its robustness in comparing high-dimensional semantic vectors like those from SentenceTransformer models.

Code Highlights

vectors = np.stack([doc_vectors[url] for url in urls])

Efficiently converts a list of vectors into a matrix suitable for batch similarity calculations.

sim_matrix = cosine_similarity(vectors)

Performs the core similarity computation across all document embeddings simultaneously.

sim_df = pd.DataFrame(sim_matrix, index=urls, columns=urls)

Converts the numeric matrix into a human-readable and manipulable DataFrame with URLs as labels.

Ranking of Related Documents: rank_related_documents

This function generates a ranked list of the most related documents for each document in the collection, based on the previously computed similarity scores. It effectively identifies the top N documents that are most semantically similar to each source document.

Explanation

Input:

The function takes a similarity DataFrame (similarity_df), which contains pairwise cosine similarity scores between all document pairs, and an optional parameter top_n specifying how many top related documents to return per source document.

Process:

For each document (each row in the DataFrame), the function extracts similarity scores with all other documents, excluding the document itself to avoid self-matching.
It sorts these scores in descending order, so the most similar documents appear first.
The function then selects the top N documents, where N is configurable, defaulting to 5.
These top related documents along with their similarity scores are stored in a dictionary keyed by the source document URL.

Output:

A dictionary where each key is a source document URL, and the value is a list of tuples containing the related document URL and the similarity score. For example:

{ “docA_url”: [(“docB_url”, 0.85), (“docC_url”, 0.82), …], … }

Code Highlights

scores = similarity_df.loc[url].drop(labels=[url])

Excludes the source document’s similarity to itself to prevent trivial matches.

ranked = scores.sort_values(ascending=False).head(top_n)

Sorts and truncates the similarity scores to focus on the top matches.

ranked_output[url] = list(ranked.items())

Converts the sorted Series into a list of tuples for easy consumption by downstream processes.

Result Explanation and Analysis

The output presents a list of related documents for each provided URL, ranked by their semantic similarity scores. These scores reflect how closely the content of one document relates to another, measured through advanced text embedding techniques.

Score Range and Interpretation

· Score Range: Similarity scores range from 0.0 to 1.0.

· Higher Scores (e.g., 0.7 to 1.0): Indicate a strong semantic relationship. Documents with scores in this range share closely related topics, ideas, or themes. High scores suggest these pages can be considered as closely connected or potentially complementary in content.

· Moderate Scores (e.g., 0.4 to 0.7): Indicate partial thematic overlap. The documents share some related content or concepts but also include distinct elements. These pages may cover related but not identical subjects.

· Lower Scores (below 0.4): Indicate weak semantic similarity. Documents in this range are largely different in content and likely address separate topics.

What the Scores Mean in Practice

· High similarity scores (above 0.7) suggest that the pages could be strong candidates for cross-linking or grouping together under a common content theme, enhancing topical authority and user navigation.

· Moderate scores may point to opportunities for content expansion or refinement to bridge gaps or better connect related subjects.

· Low scores indicate content that is less related, where internal linking or content merging is generally not recommended unless for navigational purposes.

Example Insights from the Data

· For the URL https://thatware.co/handling-different-document-urls-using-http-headers/, related pages have similarity scores around 0.55 and 0.44, indicating moderate content overlap.

· The URL https://thatware.co/competitors-gbp-listing-analysis-optimization/ has a high similarity score (0.77) with https://thatware.co/seo-success-with-seo-tool-lab/, demonstrating a strong relationship in topics covered.

· These reciprocal similarity scores confirm consistent semantic relationships between pages, reinforcing the validity of the analysis

Why This Matters for SEO and Content Strategy

· Understanding semantic relatedness helps identify clusters of content that address similar subjects or themes.

· This knowledge supports more effective content grouping, organization, and planning to improve user experience and site coherence.

· It also assists in prioritizing pages for updates, consolidation, or further content development based on thematic relevance.

· Employing data-driven similarity insights enables scalable management of large content collections with minimal manual effort.

Understanding Document Similarity Scores

When the tool processes a list of web pages, it evaluates how semantically similar each document is to every other document in the set. This is accomplished through cosine similarity on averaged sentence embeddings. The result is a score ranging between 0.0 and 1.0 for each page pair.

What the Score Means

High Similarity (Score: 0.70 – 1.00):

Pages with a score in this range share strong topical alignment. They often cover the same subject area or have significant content overlap. These pages are ideal candidates for:

Cross-linking to strengthen internal SEO signals
Grouping under shared topical clusters (e.g., in content hubs)
Structuring around a common parent page for pillar-cluster models
Moderate Similarity (Score: 0.40 – 0.69):

This range reflects partial overlap—pages may cover related but not identical topics. While they may not belong in the same cluster, they still present opportunities for:

Contextual cross-linking where the relationship feels natural
SEO silos where different posts support a broader subject
User guidance through suggested reading or next steps
Low Similarity (Score: below 0.40):

Pages in this category are topically distant. Linking between them is usually discouraged unless a specific business or UX reason supports it. These scores help identify:

Which pages should not be grouped together
Opportunities to reduce redundant or off-topic links
Gaps in coverage (if pages are expected to be related but score low)

Why It Matters

Improved Crawl Efficiency: Internal links based on actual semantic similarity help search engines crawl and interpret the site in a more structured way. Irrelevant or weakly-related links confuse crawlers and dilute topical focus.
Enhanced Authority Signals: By tightly interlinking thematically related pages, the site sends stronger signals about its expertise in that domain, improving chances of ranking higher for competitive queries.
Stronger User Experience: Visitors benefit from being directed to content that logically follows from what they’re reading, which boosts time on site and reduces bounce rates.

Recommended Actions for Clients

Identify pages with scores above 0.7 and prioritize them for internal linking. These are strong candidates for reinforcing your site’s topical hierarchy.
For scores between 0.4–0.7, review the content contextually. If there’s a narrative or informational flow between the two, insert contextual links or suggested reading widgets.
Avoid linking pages with scores below 0.4 unless there’s a very clear business or navigational reason. This helps maintain SEO integrity and user focus.
Consider grouping highly similar documents into shared categories, landing pages, or subfolders to aid both users and search engine bots in navigating the content effectively.

Understanding Anchor Relevance Scores (Internal Link Suggestions)

Beyond comparing whole documents, the tool analyzes every sentence in a page to find potential anchor text candidates—specific lines that semantically align with another related document. This is critical for determining where to place internal links within the content.

What the Anchor Score Means

Each anchor suggestion comes with a relevance score, representing how closely the sentence matches the content of the destination document. This score ranges from 0.0 to 1.0 and is used to gauge how appropriate and meaningful the link placement would be.

Strong Anchor Candidate (Score: 0.30 and above):

Sentences in this range have a very strong semantic connection to the target document. These anchors:

Read naturally when linked
Support the context of the destination page
Reinforce keyword and topical relevance
Moderate Anchor Candidate (Score: 0.20 – 0.29):

These anchors are somewhat related, though not perfect. They may still be usable:

If slightly reworded for clarity or specificity
In support or “learn more” sections
As backup anchors when stronger ones aren’t available
Weak Anchor Candidate (Score: below 0.20):

These sentences are generally not recommended as anchor text:

They may lack relevance to the linked content
They risk confusing users or disrupting reading flow
They could dilute the perceived authority of the linked page

Why It Matters

Precision in Link Placement: Instead of randomly inserting links, this method pinpoints exact sentences where a link would be most contextually appropriate.
SEO Relevance Boost: When anchor text semantically matches the linked page, search engines gain a stronger understanding of what that page is about, which boosts its potential to rank.
Editorial Efficiency: The model saves significant editorial time by suggesting ready-to-link sentences with confidence scores. Content teams can implement links without deep manual review.

Recommended Actions for Clients

Focus on anchor suggestions with scores above 0.30. These are prime opportunities for internal links that strengthen semantic relevance and improve user navigation.
For scores between 0.20 and 0.30, review the sentence manually. If the match feels strong in context, use the link as-is or tweak the wording slightly.
Skip or deprioritize anchors below 0.20. If no stronger anchors are available, it’s often better to leave the page unlinked than to introduce an irrelevant or forced connection.
Review the block_index and tag associated with each anchor to locate it easily in your HTML or CMS and implement changes precisely.

What should I do after receiving the similarity scores for my pages?

After running your URLs through the system, begin by reviewing the document similarity scores. These indicate how topically aligned different pages on your site are. For each page:

Identify other pages with high similarity scores (above 0.70)
Review moderate scores (0.40–0.70) for supportive linking potential
Avoid linking to pages with low scores (below 0.40), unless justified by UX or business intent

This will help prioritize which internal links will add value both for search engines and users.

Interpreting Results and Taking Action

This section provides practical answers to common questions clients may have after running their URLs through the system. It is divided into two distinct areas:

Part 1: Overall Page Similarity Scores
Part 2: Page Link Suggestion Scores

Part 1: Understanding Overall Page Similarity Scores

What does the overall similarity score mean?

The overall page similarity score measures how semantically alike two complete pages are. It’s calculated based on the average meaning of all sentences in each page. A score close to 1.0 indicates both pages cover very similar content, while a score closer to 0.0 suggests they are quite different in meaning and topic.

What range is considered a good score?

In most SEO use cases, pages are expected to be distinct unless they serve the same purpose. Therefore:

A low score (0.0 to 0.3) means the two pages are sufficiently different, which is usually ideal.
A moderate score (0.3 to 0.6) shows some conceptual overlap but not severe.
A high score (above 0.6 or 0.7) suggests the pages are potentially redundant or targeting the same search intent.

Why does a high similarity score matter?

A high similarity score between two different URLs can lead to:

Keyword cannibalization, where both pages compete for the same queries.
Diluted content authority, as signals are split between pages.
Indexing confusion, as search engines may struggle to prioritize one over the other.

This weakens the site’s performance in search rankings.

What should I do if two pages have a high similarity score?

Here are practical steps:

Merge the content into one comprehensive article if the topics overlap completely.
Differentiate the angle of each page. For example, make one a how-to guide and the other a case study.
Adjust metadata, headers, and internal structure to signal different intent.
Redirect or remove one of the pages if it’s no longer offering unique value.

A similarity score above 0.7 between two distinct pages should almost always prompt a review.

Should I create internal links between two pages with a high similarity score?

No. Pages that are too similar are not good candidates for internal linking. Linking them could confuse users and search engines further. Instead, the goal should be to reduce the similarity or consolidate content, not reinforce it.

Part 2: Understanding Page Link Suggestion Scores

What is the anchor relevance score? This score reflects how suitable a specific sentence is as a place to insert an internal link to a related page. It is based on sentence-level semantic matching — not just keyword overlap. The score ranges from 0.0 to 1.0.

How to interpret the anchor relevance score?

A high score (0.25 and above) suggests the sentence is contextually well-matched with the target page. It’s a strong candidate for internal linking.
A moderate score (around 0.15 to 0.25) is acceptable, but you should manually review the context to ensure natural fit.
A low score (below 0.15) usually indicates weak relevance and should be avoided as a link insertion point.

Why does this matter for SEO?

Good internal links improve:

User navigation, guiding visitors to relevant deeper content.
Topical authority, by connecting related ideas.
Search engine crawlability, helping bots discover important pages.

Contextual internal links — placed in the body of informative content — are much more valuable than generic footer or sidebar links.

What should I do with a recommended anchor sentence?

When a high-relevance sentence is provided:

Insert a hyperlink to the target page from within that sentence.
Ensure the sentence remains grammatically and contextually intact.
If needed, lightly rewrite the sentence for better flow, but keep the semantic match.

You don’t need to use every suggestion — focus on the ones with strong scores and natural placement.

Can a page have strong link suggestions even if it’s not similar overall?

Yes, and this is key. Two pages might cover different core topics but still intersect on a subtopic. A sentence touching on that subtopic becomes a natural point to link. This is the ideal situation — low overall similarity but high sentence-level relevance for internal linking.

Final Thoughts

This system is designed to help you make data-driven decisions around internal content relationships. By combining overall page similarity analysis with context-aware internal linking suggestions, you now have visibility into how your content performs semantically — both at the page level and within individual sentences.

Key Takeaways:

High overall similarity between two different pages signals a risk of content overlap. This may harm SEO through keyword cannibalization or reduced crawl efficiency. In such cases, consider merging, rewriting, or re-targeting one of the pages.
High anchor relevance scores highlight strong opportunities to build meaningful internal links. These links improve both user experience and search engine performance when inserted naturally into well-matched sentences.

Going forward, use these insights as part of a content governance process:

Regularly audit new and existing pages for semantic duplication.
Strategically insert internal links based on sentence-level semantic fit.
Continuously monitor and evolve content based on intent differentiation.

This system is flexible and designed for repeatable use — run it across different sets of URLs, compare new blog posts to cornerstone content, or evaluate topical clusters. Every score, every sentence suggestion is a signal that helps you shape a cleaner, smarter internal structure for stronger SEO outcomes.

Tuhin Banik

Thatware | Founder & CEO

Tuhin is recognized across the globe for his vision to revolutionize digital transformation industry with the help of cutting-edge technology. He won bronze for India at the Stevie Awards USA as well as winning the India Business Awards, India Technology Award, Top 100 influential tech leaders from Analytics Insights, Clutch Global Front runner in digital marketing, founder of the fastest growing company in Asia by The CEO Magazine and is a TEDx speaker and BrightonSEO speaker.