Get a Customized Website SEO Audit and Quantum SEO Marketing Strategy
The project explores how advanced pattern recognition can be applied to query matching in SEO to move beyond surface-level keyword targeting. Search queries often exhibit recurring structures, phrasings, and contextual variations that reveal consistent patterns in how users seek information. Recognizing these patterns allows webpages to be aligned not just with isolated terms but with broader intent-driven search behaviors.
The implementation integrates structured content extraction, natural language processing, and clustering algorithms to identify, group, and analyze recurring query structures. These are then mapped against webpage sections to evaluate alignment quality, detect gaps, and highlight opportunities for improved coverage.
By uncovering recurring query patterns, the project ensures that content strategies are informed by real patterns of search behavior. The approach delivers greater topical depth, improves intent alignment, and enhances overall visibility by matching webpages to the recurring ways users express their needs in search.
Project Purpose
The purpose of this project is to establish a framework that systematically detects recurring query patterns and applies them to SEO content optimization. Traditional keyword analysis often isolates terms without accounting for the repeating structures in user behavior, which limits the ability to capture the full scope of search intent. This project addresses that gap by moving from single-term optimization toward pattern-based optimization.
Key objectives include:
Refining Query-to-Content Matching Detecting recurring query structures and comparing them with webpage content ensures a more accurate measure of alignment with real search behavior.
Exposing Content Weaknesses and Missed Opportunities Pattern analysis reveals where recurring user expressions are underrepresented or absent in content, guiding targeted improvements and expansion strategies.
Reinforcing Topical Authority Comprehensive coverage of recurring search patterns strengthens a site’s authority in its niche, improving both search visibility and user trust.
Through this purpose-driven framework, query matching evolves into a pattern-oriented process that emphasizes consistency, intent coverage, and authority-building rather than isolated keyword matches.
Project’s Key Topics Explanation and Understanding
Pattern Recognition in Search Data
Pattern recognition refers to the systematic process of identifying recurring structures, relationships, or signals in data. In the context of search behavior, patterns often emerge from the ways users phrase their queries. For instance, queries like “how to optimize blog content,” “steps to optimize content for SEO,” and “best way to optimize content” all reflect a recurring pattern of instructional phrasing. By analyzing these recurring query structures, it becomes possible to group similar queries together, identify dominant forms of expression, and prioritize optimization around the most impactful linguistic patterns. This process transforms raw keyword lists into meaningful clusters that directly mirror how search intent manifests in user behavior.
Query Matching Beyond Keywords
Traditional SEO query matching has focused on exact keyword matches, where the presence of specific terms within content determines relevance. While effective at a basic level, this approach misses the nuances of user phrasing, synonymous structures, and contextual variations. For example, the difference between “SEO guide” and “guide to SEO best practices” may seem minor, but in aggregate, these variations form recognizable recurring patterns that reveal intent consistency. By integrating pattern recognition, query matching evolves into a more refined process where relevance is measured against recurring linguistic frameworks rather than isolated terms. This ensures content alignment even when the wording differs, which is increasingly vital in an environment where search engines reward contextual understanding over keyword density.
Recurring Structures in User Queries
User queries frequently fall into recurring structures such as:
- Instructional queries: “how to…,” “steps for…,” “ways to…”
- Comparative queries: “difference between…,” “X vs Y,” “which is better…”
- Exploratory queries: “what is…,” “examples of…,” “types of…”
- Transactional queries: “best tool for…,” “buy… online,” “top rated…”
Recognizing and categorizing these structures creates a foundation for pattern-based optimization. Each recurring query form signals a distinct type of intent, and content alignment must reflect this structural repetition. Detecting these patterns is not limited to word overlap but involves structural parsing and semantic clustering, which provide a richer view of how intent manifests across large sets of queries.
Role of Natural Language Processing (NLP)
Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques play a central role in detecting and analyzing patterns in queries. NLP enables tokenization, part-of-speech tagging, semantic embedding, and clustering of query data to uncover similarities that might not be visible through keyword-only analysis. For example, NLP models can identify that “methods to increase traffic” and “ways to grow website visitors” share a recurring intent pattern despite having few exact keyword overlaps. By leveraging transformer-based models, the project introduces context-aware recognition, ensuring that recurring structures are captured with high fidelity. This allows the system to go beyond surface-level matches and instead align content with the true recurring forms of search expression.
Importance of Query Pattern Detection in SEO
Recurring query patterns reveal more than just word repetition — they highlight how audiences consistently seek information. Optimizing content to align with these patterns ensures higher chances of visibility because search engines interpret such content as intent-complete and contextually authoritative. For example, if a significant proportion of queries in a niche consistently adopt “how to” phrasing, content that addresses this instructional pattern comprehensively will achieve stronger alignment. This structured approach shifts SEO strategy from reactive keyword targeting to proactive intent modeling, leading to greater long-term impact.
Refinement of Query-to-Content Matching
Once recurring query patterns are identified, the next step is refining how these are matched against webpage content. Instead of checking for direct keyword inclusion, the process evaluates whether the content reflects the identified structures. For example, a content section answering “how to optimize images for SEO” should also satisfy variations like “steps to optimize website images” because both belong to the same recurring instructional pattern. This refinement bridges the gap between raw user behavior and structured content, allowing alignment to be evaluated at the level of recurring intent expression rather than fragmented keyword occurrences.
SEO Benefits of Pattern-Oriented Matching
The adoption of pattern recognition for query matching yields multiple advantages for SEO strategy:
- Comprehensive Intent Coverage: Ensures that recurring query forms are consistently addressed across content, reducing gaps.
- Improved Relevance Signals: Increases semantic alignment with how users actually phrase their searches, which search engines increasingly prioritize.
- Topical Authority Building: Demonstrates consistent coverage of dominant query structures, signaling expertise and authority within a subject area.
- Scalable Optimization: Allows systematic detection of recurring query forms across large datasets, making optimization repeatable and efficient.
Q&A Section
How does pattern recognition improve query matching compared to traditional methods?
Traditional query matching often works on surface-level keyword overlaps, which risks missing variations in phrasing, intent markers, or structural differences across searches. Pattern recognition takes this further by detecting recurring query structures and linguistic cues — such as “how to,” “best way,” or “tools for.” By recognizing these patterns, the system aligns related queries even if the exact keywords differ. This ensures that search coverage captures intent-driven variations, which directly supports content visibility across a wider set of relevant searches.
What are the practical SEO benefits of this approach?
Refining query matching with pattern recognition ensures that content becomes discoverable across a broader set of search variations. For example, a page optimized around “handling document URLs” can now also rank for intent-aligned queries such as “how to manage different document links” or “best practices for URL handling.” This prevents competitors from capturing visibility for related terms and secures more long-tail traffic. In practice, this strengthens topical authority, safeguards ranking opportunities, and enhances the return on existing content investments.
How does this project help in identifying content gaps?
By analyzing recurring query structures, the system reveals not only what is covered but also what is consistently missing. For instance, if recurring patterns show strong demand for “step-by-step” or “comparison-based” searches, and the existing content does not address these formats, it becomes clear where content expansion is needed. Strategists can then create new sections or dedicated pages to fill those gaps, ensuring content coverage is both complete and competitive.
In what way does this enhance topical authority?
Topical authority depends on consistently covering a subject across its many user-driven variations. Pattern recognition identifies the recurring query frameworks that shape user expectations within a topic. By aligning content with these structures — such as tutorials, comparisons, or explanatory breakdowns — a site demonstrates depth and relevance. This alignment signals to search engines that the domain fully addresses the topic, improving authority and long-term ranking stability.
How does this project support search intent alignment?
Search engines increasingly prioritize whether content aligns with user intent rather than just matching words. By uncovering query patterns, the project identifies subtle differences in search behavior — such as informational intent (“how does it work”), navigational intent (“tools for managing”), or transactional intent (“best solutions to buy”). Mapping these variations ensures that content sections serve the right intent, which reduces bounce rates, improves engagement, and supports higher visibility for intent-consistent searches.
Can this system improve internal linking strategies?
Yes. Detecting recurring query patterns makes it easier to identify logical internal linking opportunities. For example, queries clustered around “setup,” “configuration,” and “troubleshooting” may belong to separate content sections but share a common topical base. Recognizing these relationships helps strategists design meaningful links between related sections, guiding users smoothly across the content and reinforcing topic coverage in the eyes of search engines.
How does this analysis translate into actionable insights?
The deliverables of this project go beyond theoretical detection. Strategists receive clear signals about which query groups exist, how they map to content, and where opportunities remain untapped. For example, visual insights highlight clusters of recurring search structures, while coverage analysis pinpoints underrepresented query types. These outputs make it straightforward to decide whether to expand, restructure, or reinforce content — ensuring that optimizations are guided by real user search patterns rather than guesswork.
Libraries Used
re
The re module is a built-in Python library that provides support for working with regular expressions. It enables pattern-based searching, substitution, and text splitting, which is critical when dealing with unstructured or messy textual data.
In this project, re was used to detect and clean specific patterns in webpage text and queries, such as removing unwanted symbols, handling whitespace, and normalizing formats. This ensured the extracted data was clean and consistent before passing into embedding and similarity models.
html
The html library is designed to handle HTML entities and escape sequences. It allows for decoding encoded characters like & or < into their human-readable equivalents.
Here, html was utilized to convert encoded characters in raw webpage content into plain text. This ensured that the textual data being processed for embeddings and clustering reflected the true semantic meaning, improving the accuracy of similarity and clustering outputs.
unicodedata
The unicodedata module provides access to the Unicode Character Database and supports normalization of characters. This is particularly useful when dealing with multilingual or variably encoded text sources.
In this project, it was applied to normalize webpage content into consistent Unicode forms. This step prevented encoding-related inconsistencies that could otherwise degrade similarity scoring and model interpretation, especially when handling diverse webpages.
dataclasses
The dataclasses library simplifies the creation of structured, boilerplate-free data objects. It provides a clean way to define lightweight classes for storing and accessing attributes.
In this project, dataclasses was used to represent structured webpage blocks and query-related data. By encapsulating metadata, content text, and embeddings into consistent data structures, the project maintained modularity and readability across all processing stages.
typing
The typing library provides type hints, allowing developers to specify expected data types for function arguments and return values. It enhances readability and reduces implementation errors.
Within this project, typing was applied to annotate functions and data structures with clear type expectations, such as lists of queries or dictionaries of section data. This improved maintainability, made the pipeline easier to extend, and reduced ambiguity in collaborative use cases.
collections (Counter, defaultdict)
The collections library provides specialized data structures like Counter for frequency counts and defaultdict for creating dictionaries with default values. Both are highly efficient for text analytics and data management.
Here, Counter was used to analyze frequency of terms or intent categories across queries and page sections. defaultdict supported smooth aggregation of section embeddings and intent labels without requiring explicit initialization, reducing code complexity and improving performance.
requests
The requests library is a widely used Python HTTP library for sending and handling web requests. It simplifies fetching online resources by managing headers, cookies, and connection handling.
In this project, requests was used to fetch webpage HTML data directly from client-provided URLs. This enabled dynamic extraction of page content for further cleaning, structuring, and embedding-based analysis.
BeautifulSoup
BeautifulSoup is a Python library for parsing HTML and XML documents. It provides a simple interface to navigate, search, and manipulate webpage elements.
In this project, BeautifulSoup was used to parse and clean webpage HTML. It complemented trafilatura by handling cases where direct structured block extraction was insufficient, ensuring all useful textual elements were captured and standardized.
trafilatura
trafilatura is a specialized Python library designed for extracting main text content from web pages. It filters out irrelevant parts like navigation menus and advertisements.
In this project, trafilatura was crucial for extracting clean, content-rich sections from pages. It provided a reliable baseline for section creation, which was later enhanced with custom parsing for complex or non-standard web structures.
numpy
NumPy is a core numerical computing library in Python, optimized for array operations and linear algebra. It serves as the foundation for many data science and machine learning tasks.
In this project, NumPy was used to handle embedding vectors, similarity calculations, and intermediate matrix transformations. Its efficient array operations ensured smooth computation even when processing large sets of query and section embeddings.
pandas
Pandas is a data analysis and manipulation library built around DataFrame objects. It is widely used for structuring, cleaning, and analyzing datasets.
In this project, pandas was used to organize extracted webpage blocks, queries, embeddings, and similarity scores into tabular structures. This made the pipeline outputs more interpretable and easier to pass into clustering or visualization modules.
sklearn.metrics.pairwise.cosine_similarity
This module from scikit-learn provides functions to compute pairwise similarity between vectors, with cosine similarity being one of the most widely used metrics in NLP.
In this project, cosine similarity was used to measure the alignment between query embeddings and webpage section embeddings. It served as the foundation for identifying relevant sections and quantifying their degree of match to client queries.
sklearn.cluster.AgglomerativeClustering
Agglomerative Clustering is a hierarchical clustering algorithm available in scikit-learn. It builds nested clusters by successively merging or splitting groups based on distance metrics.
Here, it was used to cluster semantically similar sections of webpages. This provided insights into content coverage and grouping, helping clients understand whether their content blocks were consistent or fragmented in terms of topic relevance.
hdbscan
HDBSCAN (Hierarchical Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise) is an advanced clustering library that detects variable-density clusters and identifies noise in datasets.
In this project, HDBSCAN was used to identify clusters of semantically related content sections without requiring a predefined number of clusters. This allowed for more natural grouping of content, reflecting the organic structure of long-form webpages.
matplotlib.pyplot
Matplotlib is a popular visualization library in Python, and its pyplot interface provides functions for creating static, interactive, and publication-quality plots.
Here, pyplot was used to create visualizations of similarity distributions, section alignment, and clustering results. These visuals made the outputs more client-friendly and supported actionable insights during result analysis.
seaborn
Seaborn is a statistical data visualization library built on top of Matplotlib. It simplifies the process of creating complex and aesthetically pleasing visualizations.
In this project, Seaborn was applied to generate similarity heatmaps, cluster plots, and distribution charts. These enhanced the clarity of client reports by visually highlighting strengths and weaknesses in content–query alignment.
sentence_transformers
The SentenceTransformers library provides easy-to-use models for generating sentence and document embeddings. It is widely adopted for semantic similarity and retrieval tasks.
In this project, SentenceTransformers was used to generate dense vector representations of both queries and webpage sections. These embeddings formed the basis for cosine similarity scoring and clustering, enabling high-quality semantic matching.
logging
The logging module is a built-in Python library for recording log messages during program execution. It helps track system behavior, errors, and debugging information.
In this project, logging was configured to provide warnings and errors in a standardized format. This allowed better monitoring of data extraction, model calls, and similarity scoring, ensuring the pipeline remained transparent and debuggable.
torch
PyTorch is an open-source machine learning framework widely used for building and running deep learning models. It powers many transformer-based NLP models.
Here, PyTorch served as the backend for running SentenceTransformers and Hugging Face transformer models. It ensured efficient computation of embeddings and classification tasks while supporting GPU acceleration for scalability.
transformers
The Hugging Face transformers library provides pre-trained state-of-the-art NLP models and pipelines for tasks such as classification, translation, and text generation.
In this project, transformers was used to load DeBERTa and other transformer models for zero-shot classification, intent detection, and embedding generation. It enabled sophisticated NLP tasks within the SEO context, showcasing how advanced models can refine query–content alignment.
Section and PageDocument Dataclasses
Overview
The Section and PageDocument dataclasses are designed to create a structured, consistent way of representing webpage content after extraction. Section models each coherent block of content (usually tied to a heading and its associated text), while PageDocument represents the entire webpage, containing its URL, title, and a list of extracted Section objects. These classes allow the pipeline to work with structured entities instead of raw HTML, making downstream tasks like embedding generation, clustering, and similarity scoring significantly more reliable.
Key Lines Explanation
· @dataclass: Simplifies the creation of classes by automatically generating methods like __init__ and __repr__, making the code more concise.
· heading: str and content: str: Define the title of a section and its main textual content, ensuring semantic clarity for each block.
· blocks: List[str] = field(default_factory=list): Stores fine-grained content elements such as paragraphs or list items within a section, enabling more detailed analysis.
· section_id: Optional[str] = None: Provides a unique identifier for each section, useful for linking extracted sections back to their original page structure.
· PageDocument: Aggregates url, title, and all extracted sections into one unified object for each page processed.
Function extract_page_content
Overview
This function handles the extraction and structuring of webpage content from a given URL. It begins by fetching the HTML content, then parsing it with BeautifulSoup to detect titles, headings, and associated text blocks. It organizes the content into Section objects, building a clear hierarchy based on heading levels (H1–H6). If the webpage lacks structured headings, it falls back to trafilatura to capture the main text body. The output is returned as a PageDocument instance, encapsulating all structured sections of the webpage. This structured extraction is essential for semantic analysis, similarity scoring, and clustering in later stages of the project.
Key Lines Explanation
· resp = requests.get(url, timeout=timeout, headers={“User-Agent”: “Mozilla/5.0”}): Sends a GET request to fetch the page’s HTML while including a user-agent header to avoid being blocked by servers.
· soup = BeautifulSoup(html_doc, “lxml”): Parses the raw HTML using the lxml parser, which is fast and robust for complex documents.
· title = soup.title.string.strip() if soup.title and soup.title.string else url: Captures the page’s title if available, falling back to the URL otherwise.
· def norm_text(t: str) -> str: Defines a helper function to clean and normalize text using HTML unescaping, Unicode normalization, and whitespace collapsing.
· headings = soup.find_all(re.compile(r”^h[1-6]$”)): Finds all heading tags (H1–H6) in the document, establishing the backbone for section structuring.
· while sib: …: Iterates through sibling nodes of each heading to capture the section’s content until the next heading of the same or higher level.
· blocks = [norm_text(b.get_text(” “)) for b in h.find_all_next([“p”, “li”], limit=30)]: Collects a limited number of nearby paragraphs and list items for finer granularity within the section.
· sections.append(Section(…)): Creates a Section object for each heading and its associated content.
· trafilatura.extract(…): Fallback method to extract the main textual content if headings are absent or malformed.
· return PageDocument(url=url, title=title, sections=sections): Returns a fully structured PageDocument, encapsulating all sections for downstream analysis.
Function preprocess_extracted_content
Overview
This function standardizes and cleans the raw text extracted from a webpage to prepare it for deeper semantic analysis. While extract_page_content focuses on capturing structure (titles, headings, and text blocks), this preprocessing step ensures textual consistency across all sections. The function applies normalization techniques to remove noise such as irregular whitespace, stray symbols, and inconsistent casing. By doing so, it ensures that downstream tasks—such as embedding generation, intent classification, and similarity scoring—operate on uniform, high-quality text inputs. The output is a cleaned PageDocument object where each section’s content is processed while retaining the hierarchical structure.
Key Lines Explanation
· def norm_text(t: str) -> str: Defines a helper method responsible for text normalization. This isolates preprocessing logic and makes it reusable across multiple parts of the pipeline.
· html.unescape(t): Converts HTML entities (e.g., &, ) into their readable character equivalents, ensuring text matches natural language form.
· unicodedata.normalize(“NFKC”, t): Applies Unicode normalization to unify character variants (e.g., full-width vs half-width characters, accented characters). This prevents embedding or model inconsistencies caused by variant encodings.
· re.sub(r”\s+”, ” “, t): Collapses multiple whitespace occurrences into a single space, ensuring clean tokenization for NLP models.
· lower().strip(): Converts text to lowercase and removes leading/trailing whitespace, giving a standardized text format. Lowercasing ensures consistent embedding and similarity scoring.
· for section in page_doc.sections: Iterates over every extracted section of the PageDocument. This ensures cleaning is applied uniformly across the entire structured document.
· section.content_blocks = [norm_text(b) for b in section.content_blocks]: Applies normalization to each content block inside a section. This is crucial for maintaining fine granularity and preparing each block for embedding.
· return page_doc: Returns the cleaned PageDocument with the same hierarchical structure but processed text, ready for semantic analysis.
Function load_embedder
Overview
This function is responsible for loading the embedding model that converts textual content into dense vector representations. These embeddings are the foundation for all semantic similarity, intent alignment, and clustering tasks within the project. By default, it uses the highly effective all-mpnet-base-v2 model from the sentence-transformers library, which is optimized for capturing contextual meaning across diverse domains, including SEO content. The function includes error handling to ensure that any loading issues (e.g., model not found, device incompatibility) are logged and raised clearly, making debugging easier.
The model is loaded onto the most efficient computing device available—GPU if present, otherwise CPU—ensuring faster inference when processing large volumes of text. Once loaded, this embedding model becomes a reusable component across multiple pipeline steps, from content-query similarity scoring to topic clustering.
Key Lines Explanation
· def load_embedder(model_name: str = “sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2”): Defines the function with a default parameter set to a widely used embedding model. This allows flexibility—clients can swap in different models if desired, without changing the function logic.
· device = torch.device(“cuda” if torch.cuda.is_available() else “cpu”): Automatically detects whether a GPU is available. If yes, the model is placed on GPU for faster embedding generation; otherwise, it runs on CPU. This ensures portability across environments.
· model = SentenceTransformer(model_name, device=device): Loads the embedding model from the Hugging Face sentence-transformers library. This is the core operation that makes the model ready for generating semantic embeddings.
· return model: Returns the loaded model object so it can be used by other functions (e.g., embedding generation, similarity scoring).
· except Exception as e: Catches any issues during model loading (e.g., invalid model name, network failure while downloading, device mismatch).
Model sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2
Purpose in the Project
The all-mpnet-base-v2 model is used for generating semantic embeddings of both query text and webpage content sections. These embeddings capture nuanced meaning and context, enabling the system to measure semantic similarity rather than relying only on keyword overlap. This is critical in SEO tasks where user intent often extends beyond exact wording.
Why This Model
· MPNet backbone: Combines masked language modeling with permuted language modeling to capture deep bidirectional dependencies more effectively than BERT or RoBERTa.
· Fine-tuned for similarity tasks: The sentence-transformers implementation is optimized for sentence-pair comparison, making it highly suitable for measuring semantic closeness.
· Balance of efficiency and accuracy: Delivers strong semantic accuracy while maintaining computational efficiency, enabling practical use on large documents and multiple queries.
Application in the Workflow
· Structured content blocks extracted from webpages are encoded into dense vector embeddings.
· Queries are encoded into the same embedding space, ensuring direct comparability.
· Cosine similarity is computed between query embeddings and section embeddings to provide:
- Identification of sections most aligned with the query.
- Clustering of semantically related sections.
- Recognition of recurring themes or coverage overlaps across long-form content.
Value of the Model
Use of all-mpnet-base-v2 ensures alignment between search intent and content is evaluated at a semantic level, beyond keyword matching. This strengthens the ability to:
- Detect missing or weak coverage areas.
- Consolidate semantically redundant sections.
- Support comprehensive and contextually relevant content strategies.
Function embed_texts
Overview
This function takes a list of texts (such as webpage sections or user queries) and generates their semantic embeddings using the pre-loaded SentenceTransformer model. Embeddings are high-dimensional numeric vectors that represent the meaning of the text in a way that allows similarity comparisons.
The function supports batch processing to handle large volumes of text efficiently, and it includes an option to normalize embeddings so that they can be compared directly with cosine similarity. By returning embeddings as a NumPy array, the function ensures compatibility with downstream tasks such as clustering, similarity scoring, and visualization.
Robust error handling is included to log and raise exceptions if the embedding process fails, ensuring reliability and debuggability in production workflows.
Key Lines Explanation
· def embed_texts(embedder: SentenceTransformer, texts: List[str], batch_size: int = 32, normalize: bool = True): Defines the function with parameters for:
- embedder: the pre-loaded SentenceTransformer model.
- texts: a list of strings to encode.
- batch_size: controls how many texts are processed in one batch (default: 32). This balances speed and memory usage.
- normalize: ensures embeddings are unit-length vectors when set to True, making cosine similarity calculations accurate and consistent.
· emb = embedder.encode(texts, batch_size=batch_size, show_progress_bar=False, normalize_embeddings=normalize):
- Uses the SentenceTransformer’s encode method to generate embeddings.
- batch_size=batch_size: processes texts in mini-batches to optimize memory and speed.
- show_progress_bar=False: avoids clutter in client-facing notebooks.
- normalize_embeddings=normalize: applies normalization if required, making similarity comparisons more robust.
· return np.array(emb, dtype=np.float32):
- Converts embeddings into a NumPy array with float32 precision.
- Ensures consistency for downstream ML workflows and memory efficiency.
Function embed_queries_and_sections
Overview
This function generates embeddings for both user queries and webpage sections using a given SentenceTransformer model. By encoding queries and content into vector representations, it enables semantic similarity calculations that form the backbone of intent alignment, clustering, and ranking analysis. The function outputs a dictionary containing two keys: “queries” for query embeddings and “sections” for section embeddings. This dual embedding structure ensures that queries and content are consistently represented in the same semantic space for accurate comparisons.
Key Lines Explanation
· query_embs = embed_texts(embedder, queries, batch_size=batch_size): Encodes all queries into dense vector embeddings using the provided embedder. This places user queries in the same semantic space as document sections.
· section_embs = embed_texts(embedder, sections, batch_size=batch_size): Encodes all content sections into embeddings, ensuring they can be directly compared against query embeddings.
· return {“queries”: query_embs, “sections”: section_embs}: Returns a structured dictionary containing both query and section embeddings, enabling downstream tasks such as similarity scoring, alignment, and clustering.
Function compute_similarity_matrix
Overview
This function computes the cosine similarity matrix between query embeddings and section embeddings. The output is a matrix of shape Q × S, where Q is the number of queries and S is the number of sections. Each cell in the matrix represents how semantically close a query is to a section, with values ranging from –1 (opposite meaning) to 1 (perfect similarity). If either query or section embeddings are empty, the function returns a zero matrix to ensure robustness and prevent downstream errors.
Key Lines Explanation
· if query_emb.size == 0 or section_emb.size == 0: Checks whether either embedding array is empty. If true, it returns a zero matrix to avoid invalid similarity calculations.
· cosine_similarity(query_emb, section_emb).astype(np.float32): Computes the cosine similarity between all pairs of queries and sections. The .astype(np.float32) ensures the matrix is memory-efficient and consistent with other numerical operations in the pipeline.
· return np.zeros((query_emb.shape[0], section_emb.shape[0]), dtype=np.float32): Serves as a fallback return in case of errors, ensuring the function always produces a valid numerical output even in failure scenarios.
load_nli_zero_shot
Overview
This function loads a zero-shot classification pipeline using a Natural Language Inference (NLI) model, specifically tailored for intent detection tasks. By default, it uses the DeBERTa-v3-base cross-encoder model, but a different Hugging Face model can be specified. The function includes error handling to ensure the pipeline initializes correctly, logging any issues that arise.
Key Lines Explanation
· pipeline(“zero-shot-classification”, model=model_name, device_map=”auto”): Creates a Hugging Face pipeline configured for zero-shot classification. The device_map=”auto” parameter automatically assigns computation to GPU if available, otherwise falls back to CPU.
· return zsp: Returns the initialized zero-shot classification pipeline, which can then be used for assigning intents to text without predefined training.
Model cross-encoder/nli-deberta-v3-base
Purpose in the Project
The cross-encoder/nli-deberta-v3-base model is applied for fine-grained intent classification and alignment. It is particularly effective in determining whether the relationship between a query and a content section represents strong alignment, weak alignment, or divergence.
Why This Model
- DeBERTa v3 backbone: Incorporates disentangled attention and enhanced mask decoding, achieving superior contextual understanding compared to standard BERT or RoBERTa.
- NLI specialization: Pre-trained and fine-tuned on Natural Language Inference tasks, enabling accurate classification of relationships between two text inputs (entailment, neutral, contradiction).
- Cross-encoder approach: Processes the query and section jointly, unlike bi-encoders, which ensures deeper context-level comparisons, albeit at higher computational cost.
Application in the Workflow
· Pairs of queries and content sections are passed through the cross-encoder for direct classification.
· Output probabilities are interpreted as indicators of intent alignment strength.
· These signals are integrated with embedding-based similarity to refine:
- Section-level intent matching.
- Detection of intent drift across long-form content.
- Validation of semantic clusters identified by embedding models.
Value of the Model
Use of cross-encoder/nli-deberta-v3-base ensures higher precision in intent-level decisions, making alignment analysis more reliable. Its integration supports:
- Verification of whether high-similarity embeddings truly reflect intent match.
- Identification of mismatches where sections are topically close but diverge in intent.
- Improved interpretability of intent consistency across sections, strengthening discourse and coverage evaluation.
Function classify_query_intents
Overview
This function classifies a list of search queries into predefined intent categories (default: informational, transactional, navigational) using a zero-shot NLI pipeline (e.g., DeBERTa-v3-base cross-encoder). For each query, the model assigns the most likely intent from the candidate labels. If the classification fails, the function applies a safe fallback to avoid breaking the pipeline.
Key Lines Explanation
· labels = list(candidate_labels): Converts the tuple of intent labels into a list for compatibility with the Hugging Face zero-shot pipeline.
· for q in queries: Iterates through each user query that needs to be classified.
· out = zsp(q, labels): Applies the zero-shot classification pipeline to the query against the candidate labels. The pipeline produces a ranked list of labels with confidence scores.
· intents.append(out[“labels”][0]): Appends the top-ranked label (the most probable intent) for the query into the results list.
Function cluster_queries
Overview
This function clusters queries based on their embedding representations to detect recurring semantic patterns. By default, it uses HDBSCAN (a density-based clustering algorithm well-suited for varying cluster sizes and noise detection). If HDBSCAN is not applied, it falls back to Agglomerative Clustering.
The function returns an array of cluster labels, where -1 indicates noise (queries that don’t belong to any cluster).
Key Lines Explanation
· if query_emb.shape[0] < max(2, min_cluster_size + 1): Ensures there are enough queries to perform clustering. If too few, the function returns all queries as belonging to the same default cluster (0).
· if use_hdbscan: Checks whether to use HDBSCAN for clustering.
· clusterer = hdbscan.HDBSCAN(min_cluster_size=min_cluster_size, min_samples=min_samples, metric=”euclidean”) Initializes HDBSCAN with parameters:
- min_cluster_size: the minimum number of queries needed to form a cluster.
- min_samples: controls how conservative the clustering is (higher = more noise).
- metric=”euclidean”: distance metric used to measure similarity between embeddings.
· return clusterer.fit_predict(query_emb) Performs clustering and returns cluster assignments for each query.
· n_clusters = max(1, query_emb.shape[0] // 3) When HDBSCAN is not used, the function sets a fallback number of clusters for Agglomerative Clustering, scaling by dataset size.
· AgglomerativeClustering(n_clusters=n_clusters, linkage=”average”).fit_predict(query_emb) Runs agglomerative clustering as a fallback and returns cluster labels.
Function cluster_sections
Overview
This function groups webpage content sections into clusters based on their semantic embeddings. It applies the HDBSCAN clustering algorithm, which is well-suited for noisy, high-dimensional data such as text embeddings. Clustering helps identify recurring patterns, topical groupings, and redundant content across the page. If the number of sections is too small to perform meaningful clustering, the function defaults to assigning each section a cluster label of 0. In cases where clustering fails due to errors, the function logs the issue and returns all-zero labels to maintain pipeline stability.
Key Lines Explanation
· if section_emb.shape[0] < max(5, min_cluster_size + 1):: Checks if the number of content section embeddings is too small to cluster effectively. A minimum threshold is enforced to avoid meaningless clusters.
· return np.zeros((section_emb.shape[0],), dtype=int): If the section count is insufficient, assigns all sections to a default cluster label (0) to ensure consistency.
· hdbscan.HDBSCAN(min_cluster_size=min_cluster_size, metric=”euclidean”).fit_predict(section_emb): Runs the HDBSCAN clustering algorithm with Euclidean distance on the section embeddings. Each section is assigned to a cluster, or marked as noise (-1).
Function map_queries_to_sections
Overview
This function aligns user queries with webpage sections based on similarity scores. For each query, it identifies the most relevant sections where the similarity value meets or exceeds the defined weak_thr (default: 0.30). Results are returned as a list of MatchResult objects, each containing the query, its detected intent, and the top matching sections with scores. If the similarity matrix is empty or errors occur, the function logs the issue and returns safe defaults.
Key Lines Explanation
· @dataclass class MatchResult: Defines a structured container for storing results. Each MatchResult holds:
- query: the input query string
- intent: the detected intent for that query
- top_matches: a list of tuples (url, section_heading, score)
· S = sim.shape[1] if sim.ndim == 2 else 0: Checks the similarity matrix sim. If it has valid 2D shape, retrieves the number of sections (S). Otherwise, sets S=0 to handle edge cases.
· for i, q in enumerate(queries):: Iterates through each query and its index.
· if S == 0: results.append(… top_matches=[]): If no similarity scores exist, append an empty MatchResult so the pipeline remains stable.
· row = sim[i]: Extracts the similarity scores between the current query and all sections.
· idxs = np.argsort(-row): Sorts section indices in descending order of similarity, so the most relevant sections come first.
· if score >= weak_thr: Filters out weak matches. Only keeps sections with similarity scores above the threshold.
· url, heading, _ = section_meta[j]: Retrieves metadata for each section: the page url, the heading, and an unused third field.
· triples.append((url, heading, score)): Stores the section details and its similarity score as a potential match.
· results.append(MatchResult(query=q, intent=intents[i], top_matches=triples)): Saves all collected matches for the query in the results list.
Function summarize_recurring_patterns
Overview
This function generates concise summaries of content clusters to reveal recurring patterns across webpage sections. It takes the original section texts, their cluster labels, and a summarization pipeline as inputs. For each cluster containing multiple sections, the function concatenates the texts and passes them to the summarizer, producing a short description of the cluster’s main theme. Clusters labeled as noise (−1) or singletons are ignored. The final output is a dictionary mapping each valid cluster to its generated summary, which is later used for detecting repetitive themes, topic overlaps, or content redundancies within the page.
Key Lines Explanation
· cluster_summaries = {}: Initializes an empty dictionary to hold summaries, with cluster IDs as keys and their textual summaries as values.
· for label in set(cluster_labels):: Iterates through all unique cluster labels produced by the clustering step.
· if label == -1: continue: Skips the noise cluster (−1), as it represents ungrouped or irrelevant sections.
· indices = np.where(cluster_labels == label)[0]: Finds all section indices that belong to the current cluster.
· if len(indices) < 2: continue: Ensures that only clusters with at least two sections are summarized, ignoring isolated sections.
· ” “.join([section_texts[i] for i in indices]): Concatenates the text of all sections in the current cluster into a single string for summarization.
· summary = summarizer(concatenated_text, max_length=60, min_length=20, do_sample=False)[0][“summary_text”]: Calls the summarization pipeline (e.g., transformer-based) to generate a concise cluster summary. The parameters ensure controlled summary length and deterministic output.
· cluster_summaries[label] = summary: Stores the summary under the corresponding cluster label for later retrieval.
· return cluster_summaries: Returns the dictionary of cluster-to-summary mappings for downstream analysis, such as identifying recurring content themes or checking for redundant coverage.
Function display_results
This function is responsible for presenting the final output of the analysis in a structured, human-readable format. It groups query–section matches by URL, labels them with strength indicators, and highlights recurring content patterns across multiple queries. For each query, it prints the query text and its detected intent. If no strong or weak matches exist above threshold, it explicitly informs that no results were found.
Result Analysis and Explanation
The analysis of query-to-content alignment highlights how recurring patterns are recognized and evaluated for effective query matching within a single page. The focus is on identifying whether sections of the content consistently serve multiple queries, as such overlaps reveal stronger structural relevance and better optimization opportunities.
Query 1: “How to handle different document URLs”
The alignment with this query shows multiple weak matches across sections related to canonical tags. While the system detects some association between the query and technical explanations such as adding canonical tags in HTTP headers, the weak strength scores (0.48–0.58) indicate limited clarity and insufficient emphasis in the content. This suggests that the existing coverage is fragmented and lacks a clearly structured section directly addressing the query intent.
Query 2: “Using HTTP headers for PDFs and images”
This query demonstrates strong matches across several sections, with similarity scores consistently above 0.60. Sections such as “Steps to Implement Canonical Tags for PDF, Image, and Video URLs Using HTTP Headers” and “Practical Applications of HTTP Headers for SEO” show strong alignment. This indicates that the content structure provides clear and repeated references to the practical use of HTTP headers for media files, successfully reinforcing the query pattern. The strong alignment here reflects a well-optimized content block that directly satisfies the informational intent.
Query 3: “Preventing duplicate content in documents”
This query results in weak matches, with the highest score being 0.50. The related sections are again tied to canonical tags but fail to establish strong contextual alignment. The weak alignment indicates that while the topic of duplicate content is indirectly addressed through canonical tag examples, the content does not sufficiently elaborate on preventing duplication as a distinct problem. The lack of strong matches points to a gap in how the query pattern is covered.
Pattern Recognition Findings
The evaluation reveals no recurring sections serving multiple queries with strong alignment. This absence of overlap indicates that the content lacks cohesive sections that consistently address broader patterns across different but related queries. In practice, this means that while individual queries like “Using HTTP headers for PDFs and images” are well supported, others such as “How to handle different document URLs” and “Preventing duplicate content in documents” remain weakly addressed and disconnected from the central optimized sections.
Implications of the Analysis
- Strong but Isolated Alignment: Only one query shows consistently strong alignment, demonstrating that certain sections are optimized in isolation but fail to serve multiple related queries.
- Fragmented Weak Matches: Weak matches highlight fragmented coverage where canonical tag examples appear, but without sufficient pattern reinforcement to handle intent variation.
- Lack of Recurring Patterns: The absence of sections serving multiple queries signals missed opportunities to consolidate intent coverage, which limits the content’s ability to establish itself as a comprehensive resource on the topic.
Result Analysis and Explanation
Interpreting Similarity Patterns
Similarity scores act as a signal of how closely a query aligns with available content. High scores indicate precise alignment, mid-range scores highlight partial relevance, and low scores expose weak associations. Examining these distributions across the dataset reveals not just individual matches but broader patterns of alignment and misalignment.
Strong vs. Weak Alignment
Clear differences emerge between strong and weak alignment signals:
- Strong Matches: Represent highly reliable connections where content consistently addresses query intent. These form recurring anchors that demonstrate authority within specific topics.
- Weak Matches: Indicate looser or peripheral relevance, often appearing when content overlaps without fully satisfying the underlying need. While useful for background coverage, they also highlight areas for targeted improvement.
Balance Between Strong and Weak
A balanced system should maintain a strong foundation of high-confidence matches supported by weaker signals that broaden contextual coverage. If weak matches dominate, refinement in either content or query-matching thresholds becomes essential.
Score Thresholds
- Strong Matches (≥ 0.70): Sections in this range represent high-confidence alignments. These often dominate query coverage and form the backbone of query-to-document mapping.
- Moderate Matches (0.40–0.69): These indicate relevance but with less certainty. They frequently highlight secondary matches or supporting sections across URLs.
- Weak Matches (< 0.40): Weak signals may still provide context but generally lack sufficient alignment to be considered reliable answers.
Implications of Score Distributions
- A concentration of high scores for a specific URL suggests that it serves as a primary reference point for related queries.
- A spread of moderate scores across multiple URLs indicates distribution of knowledge, where no single source dominates.
- An abundance of weak matches highlights potential mismatches or the presence of generic content without direct query relevance.
Recognition of Recurring Patterns
Patterns emerge where specific types of queries consistently connect with the same clusters of content. This repetition highlights natural specialization — some resources act as authoritative hubs for certain themes. In contrast, overlaps appear when multiple sources partially address the same intent, signaling redundancy without clear dominance. Finally, recurring weak matches expose content gaps where no strong coverage exists, creating opportunities for strategic reinforcement.
Recurring Patterns Across Content
URL Specialization
Some URLs repeatedly demonstrate strong scores for a subset of queries. This indicates specialization and content authority within specific topics.
Overlapping Coverage
When multiple URLs show moderate-to-weak matches for the same query, it indicates competitive coverage. This may be valuable for redundancy but reduces clarity in primary source identification.
Gaps in Coverage
Queries that only achieve weak matches across all URLs highlight areas where no existing content sufficiently answers the information need. These represent opportunities for content improvement.
Score Distribution as Diagnostic Insight
The overall spread of scores provides a diagnostic lens:
- High concentrations of strong matches confirm well-structured alignment with intent.
- Distributions across mid-range scores suggest partial coverage spread across multiple resources.
- Abundance of weak signals uncovers mismatches or generic material lacking direct relevance.
By recognizing these score-based trends, decision-making shifts from isolated evaluations toward systematic refinement grounded in recurring evidence.
Visualization-Based Insights
Coverage Bar Chart
This chart illustrates how queries distribute across strong, medium, and weak similarity ranges. Concentrations of strong matches confirm areas where content successfully satisfies intent, while noticeable volumes of mid and weak matches draw attention to under-optimized or incomplete coverage.
- High Coverage: Indicates broader applicability, often due to comprehensive documents.
- Low Coverage: Reflects narrow specialization or limited overlap with query sets.
URL-to-Query Distribution
Per-URL bar charts show which queries each URL serves most strongly.
- Useful for identifying the primary topics covered by each source.
- Highlights whether a URL performs consistently across queries or excels in niche cases.
Heatmap of Query–Content Relationships
The heatmap highlights recurring patterns across the dataset, showing where certain content consistently emerges as a strong match for multiple queries. Dense clusters in the heatmap signal authority-building opportunities, while sparse or scattered coverage reveals uneven performance and potential blind spots.
- Vertical Patterns: Queries repeatedly aligning with the same URL signal content authority.
- Horizontal Spread: Multiple URLs contributing to a single query reflects distributed relevance.
- Sparse Areas: Absence of strong alignment signals under-served queries.
Score Distribution Plot
The distribution of similarity scores acts as a diagnostic tool. A curve skewed toward the high end reflects robust alignment, while wide dispersions into the mid and low ranges suggest fragmented coverage. This visualization provides an at-a-glance assessment of overall system health and the balance between precision and breadth.
- Peaks at High Scores: Indicate strong performance of the system in matching.
- Peaks at Low Scores: Suggest prevalence of generic or irrelevant matches.
- Balanced Spread: Reflects a mix of strong anchors and supplementary weak signals.
Practical Implications of Pattern Recognition
The analysis moves beyond one-off query–content matches to uncover recurring structures that shape strategy:
- Authority Detection: Identifying content clusters that repeatedly surface as strong matches confirms areas of topical authority.
- Coverage Expansion: Mid-range and weak signals highlight where improvements or new resources are required to close gaps.
- Content Consolidation: Overlapping coverage indicates where focus can be sharpened by reducing redundancy and strengthening clarity.
- Strategic Refinement: Observed patterns inform threshold adjustments, query expansion, and indexing strategies to ensure stronger overall alignment.
Q&A on Project Results and Strategic Actions
How do recurring patterns in query matching improve content strategy?**
Recurring patterns reveal which themes, concepts, or structures consistently align with query intent. By detecting these repeated signals across different pieces of content, it becomes possible to identify what search engines perceive as reliable and relevant. These patterns highlight strengths that can be reinforced across other content assets to increase coverage, consistency, and visibility. Strengthening recognized patterns ensures alignment with search expectations and makes ranking more sustainable.
What insights can be drawn from overlapping similarity clusters?**
Overlapping similarity clusters point to content that shares thematic or structural signals. This overlap suggests areas where multiple pieces of content are targeting similar queries, either deliberately or unintentionally. Recognizing this allows refinement of the content portfolio by consolidating overlapping materials, reducing internal competition, and sharpening unique positioning. At the same time, overlap can be leveraged for authority building by creating strategic internal links that strengthen topical clusters.
How does pattern recognition help identify gaps in coverage?**
Pattern detection is not only about finding repeated signals but also about highlighting where no consistent match exists. Gaps become visible when certain queries or themes repeatedly fall outside high-scoring patterns. These gaps point to opportunities for new content creation or expansion of existing assets. Addressing such gaps ensures that the content ecosystem covers a broader range of query intents, preventing missed opportunities and strengthening topical authority.
Why are visualization-driven insights valuable for decision-making?**
Visualizations transform similarity scores and pattern detection into accessible narratives. They make it clear which areas demonstrate recurring strengths, where overlaps occur, and where gaps exist. By reducing complexity into pattern flows and cluster relationships, these visuals provide actionable roadmaps for refining content strategies. Decision-making becomes faster and more precise, as the visualized trends directly translate into practical steps like content consolidation, expansion, or internal linking.
What strategic actions can be taken based on recurring high-performing patterns?**
When specific patterns repeatedly score high, they act as blueprints for optimization. Strategic actions include replicating those structures in other content pieces, aligning new content development to reflect successful themes, and amplifying internal linking to highlight recognized authority hubs. Additionally, maintaining these patterns consistently across the site builds trust signals for search engines, strengthening long-term ranking stability.
How does identifying underperforming patterns guide optimization efforts?**
Patterns that consistently show weak alignment indicate areas needing structural or topical refinement. This could involve rewriting content to match detected intent signals more closely, reorganizing how queries are addressed, or enhancing contextual coverage. By focusing optimization on these recurring weak spots, it ensures that improvement efforts are highly targeted, efficient, and more likely to yield measurable gains.
Final Thoughts
The project demonstrates how advanced pattern recognition can refine the process of aligning queries with relevant content. By systematically detecting recurring structures across query–content interactions, the analysis establishes a framework for identifying what consistently drives strong alignment and topical relevance.
Recurring patterns reveal underlying semantic signals that extend beyond isolated matches. These signals highlight the value of intent-focused structures, thematic consistency, and query-responsive phrasing that can be leveraged across a content portfolio. The ability to recognize and replicate these recurring elements provides a scalable pathway to optimize content at both granular and strategic levels.
The insights drawn from the project extend beyond immediate ranking performance. They create a foundation for building resilient SEO strategies, supporting topical authority, and ensuring consistent relevance even as search algorithms evolve. By transforming raw alignment data into actionable recognition of repeatable patterns, the project positions query matching as a structured, evidence-driven process that strengthens discoverability and long-term content effectiveness.
Thatware | Founder & CEO
Tuhin is recognized across the globe for his vision to revolutionize digital transformation industry with the help of cutting-edge technology. He won bronze for India at the Stevie Awards USA as well as winning the India Business Awards, India Technology Award, Top 100 influential tech leaders from Analytics Insights, Clutch Global Front runner in digital marketing, founder of the fastest growing company in Asia by The CEO Magazine and is a TEDx speaker and BrightonSEO speaker.
