Dynamic Topical Coverage & Gap Expansion — Embedding-based analysis to reveal content gaps and strengthen SEO alignment

Get a Customized Website SEO Audit and SEO Marketing Strategy

This project establishes a structured framework for evaluating how effectively webpage content aligns with target search queries, with a focus on topical coverage and authority. By combining embeddings with similarity scoring, the system measures how well different content blocks address the intent behind queries, capturing both direct relevance and deeper semantic coverage across a domain.

The analysis pipeline highlights areas of strength, uncovers content gaps, and identifies opportunities for improved authority. Webpages are segmented into meaningful sections and compared against query embeddings to measure semantic closeness. Coverage scores, similarity distributions, and density indicators provide a detailed view of where content demonstrates strength, where it lacks depth, and how consistently it addresses multiple queries.

The deliverables include visual outputs such as query-level coverage scores, similarity distributions across blocks, section clustering, and semantic expansion of related terms. These insights provide a practical foundation for strengthening topical authority, improving internal structure, and ensuring comprehensive query alignment across long-form content.

Project Purpose

The purpose of this project is to evaluate how well webpage content aligns with predefined search intents, ensuring that the thematic direction of long-form content remains consistent and strategically focused. Search engines increasingly prioritize intent-driven relevance, making it essential to verify that each section of a page contributes meaningfully to the overall intent without introducing contradictions or dilution.

By applying advanced natural language processing techniques, the project identifies dominant intents within content, detects potential shifts in intent across sections, and measures alignment with target queries. This provides a structured, evidence-based approach to validate whether content is serving its intended purpose or straying into unrelated directions.

The outcome of this analysis directly supports content performance in competitive search landscapes. High alignment between content and query intent increases the likelihood of improved rankings, visibility, and relevance signals recognized by search engines. Detecting and correcting intent drift ensures smoother topical flow, prevents user drop-offs caused by mismatched information, and strengthens authority within chosen subject areas. These benefits translate into sustained organic growth, higher audience retention, and stronger positioning for critical keywords.

Project’s Key Topics Explanation

Semantic Embeddings for Content Understanding

Traditional keyword-matching approaches often fail to recognize the deeper relationships between queries and content. This project instead uses semantic embeddings, where each block of text is transformed into a dense numerical vector using a transformer-based model such as all-mpnet-base-v2. These embeddings capture contextual meaning by encoding not only the words used but also their surrounding context and relationships. For example, “renewable energy investment” and “green power funding” may use different surface words, yet their embeddings reveal high similarity.

On a technical level, embeddings are computed once per content block, stored for reuse, and compared using cosine similarity. This allows scalable alignment between queries, content sections, and candidate expansions. From a business perspective, this ensures that gaps are not missed simply because of wording differences, leading to higher topical coverage and greater alignment with diverse search intents.

Structured Block-Level Analysis

Rather than analyzing entire pages as monolithic units, this project extracts and evaluates content at the block level. Each block represents a logical segment of the page — for example, a paragraph, heading with content, or list. This granularity allows fine-grained tracking of how different parts of a document contribute to query relevance and intent consistency. From a technical perspective, block-level processing ensures that alignment and similarity metrics can surface both strong and weak areas within the same document. From a business standpoint, this enables more actionable insights into where content may need reinforcement or restructuring to better align with search demand.

Coverage Scoring and Density Analysis

Coverage analysis is conducted by measuring the semantic density of themes across content. Each embedding cluster is examined to determine whether concepts are represented broadly (appearing across multiple sections) or narrowly (isolated mentions). Sparse clusters indicate weak coverage, while dense clusters suggest strong topical authority.

Density is quantified by counting both the number of semantically similar terms and their distribution across blocks. Technically, this balances local representation (within a section) and global representation (across the document). Business-wise, identifying underrepresented areas prevents missed ranking opportunities, while strengthening dense clusters supports long-term authority signals in search engines.

Representative Term Extraction

To convert embedding-level signals into human-usable recommendations, representative terms are extracted from each cluster. A hybrid approach is applied:

• TF-IDF weighting highlights statistically important terms within blocks.
• Embedding-based clustering groups semantically related expressions.
• Intersection filtering ensures only meaningful and contextually relevant terms are surfaced.

The output is a list of anchor terms that define the semantic identity of each section. These anchors are not only useful for editors when creating new content but also for aligning with keyword strategies. For business execution, this bridges the gap between AI-driven insights and editorial planning, ensuring that recommendations translate into actionable language.

Gap Expansion Process

Gap expansion involves systematically identifying missing or weakly covered subtopics. The process combines query-to-content similarity analysis with intra-document density scoring. If a query intent shows low alignment with any existing section, it becomes a candidate gap. Likewise, if a cluster’s semantic density falls below a threshold, the associated terms are flagged for reinforcement.

Technically, this requires computing similarity matrices between query embeddings and block embeddings, and then scanning for low-scoring or unaligned areas. From a business standpoint, this ensures expansion efforts are not random but targeted toward areas where coverage is weakest and competitive advantage is most achievable.

Linking Plan for Internal Authority Building

Internal linking is not treated as an afterthought but as a structured output of the pipeline. Once expansions are generated, the system identifies anchor terms within existing content where new recommendations can be linked. Using semantic similarity, it maps relationships between old and new content blocks, suggesting specific link placements that strengthen topical clusters.

Technically, this involves matching embeddings of expansion terms with embeddings of existing anchor terms and verifying contextual fit. For business impact, such linking reinforces authority by signaling semantic relationships to search engines while also improving navigation and user experience. The result is a more coherent content ecosystem where each piece reinforces the whole.

Business Impact of the Approach

The combined technical processes create a framework that translates raw embeddings into structured, actionable insights. Instead of guessing which topics to add, the approach systematically identifies gaps, extracts meaningful anchors, scores opportunities, and builds linking plans. This yields several business benefits:

• Greater topical authority by expanding coverage in weak areas.
• Improved content visibility as search engines reward breadth and depth.
• Efficient execution since prioritization focuses resources on high-value opportunities.
• Long-term competitiveness by creating structured clusters that are harder for competitors to replicate.

In effect, the project transforms complex NLP outputs into a decision-making system that balances technical precision with strategic clarity.

Q&A Section for Understanding Project Value and Importance

What are the SEO benefits of this project?

This project strengthens SEO strategy by aligning webpage content with actual search intent rather than relying solely on keywords. Search engines now evaluate whether content meaningfully addresses user intent, and this project ensures that alignment is measured and optimized. Benefits include higher rankings for intent-matched queries, improved user satisfaction through more relevant page experiences, and stronger topical authority since the content stays consistent with search needs. In practical terms, this means greater visibility across varied queries, improved engagement metrics such as time-on-page, and higher conversion potential from organic traffic.

How does this project help in identifying content gaps?

By analyzing webpages section by section, the system can detect where content fails to align with target intent categories. For example, a page designed to satisfy “transactional” intent may have sections drifting into “informational” or “navigational” territory, leaving gaps in conversion-oriented content. Identifying these mismatches helps businesses refine their content strategy by filling in missing pieces, ensuring every section serves the intended SEO purpose. This leads to stronger keyword coverage, higher topical depth, and a smoother content journey for users.

Why is block-level analysis more valuable than looking at entire pages?

Pages are rarely uniform in focus. A single long-form article may contain sections with very different relevance levels to a target query. Page-level analysis often hides these variations, giving an incomplete picture. Block-level analysis breaks down content into structured sections and evaluates them individually. For SEO, this means businesses can pinpoint exactly which parts of a page attract search engines and which dilute relevance. This precision enables smarter optimization — improving weak sections without altering content that is already performing well, saving both time and resources.

How does this project improve topical authority?

Search engines reward websites that demonstrate deep, consistent expertise in a subject area. By measuring intent alignment and section consistency, this project identifies whether a webpage maintains a coherent topical flow or strays into unrelated themes. For businesses, this translates to better recognition as an authority within a niche. Strong topical authority not only boosts rankings for specific queries but also increases overall domain visibility, making future content more likely to rank quickly and effectively.

What is the value of embedding-based similarity in SEO?

Traditional SEO depends heavily on exact keyword matches, but users often phrase the same intent in many different ways. Embedding-based similarity captures meaning at a semantic level, ensuring relevance is recognized even when words differ. This is crucial for modern SEO because it expands the reach of content to long-tail queries, voice searches, and conversational queries that may not use the same wording as page content. For businesses, this increases opportunities to capture traffic from diverse search behaviors, broadening organic reach and reducing reliance on exact keyword targeting.

Why are consistency metrics like neighbor similarity important for SEO performance?

Consistency metrics evaluate whether content maintains focus across its sections. Inconsistent or fragmented content sends mixed signals to both users and search engines, weakening trust and authority. By quantifying topical consistency, this project allows businesses to identify and fix sections that break the content flow. The result is a smoother, more authoritative page that search engines can easily interpret and reward. For SEO, this strengthens both page-level ranking potential and domain-wide credibility.

How does this project add value for long-term SEO strategy?

Unlike one-off optimizations, this project provides a systematic framework that can be applied across multiple pages and updated over time. As search engines evolve toward understanding meaning and intent, the ability to measure these factors becomes a long-term competitive advantage. Businesses gain a scalable method for auditing and refining content, ensuring their SEO strategies remain adaptive and aligned with the latest ranking signals. This creates lasting improvements in organic performance, helping brands stay ahead of competitors in increasingly intent-driven search landscapes.

Function extract_blocks

Overview

The extract_blocks function is designed to fetch, clean, and segment webpage content into structured blocks, each associated with the nearest heading context. This is a crucial preprocessing step in many NLP and SEO-focused projects, because raw HTML pages are often cluttered with irrelevant tags such as navigation bars, footers, scripts, and styles. By isolating meaningful content (paragraphs and list items) and attaching them to the most recent heading (h1–h6), the function produces a clear structure of a webpage’s content flow.

This structured block format is valuable for downstream analysis like semantic similarity, intent detection, clustering, or ranking. Each block is uniquely identified by a block_id and carries metadata such as its heading, content, HTML tag type, and position. This enables precise referencing, comparison, and further enrichment in later stages of the pipeline. In short, extract_blocks converts unstructured HTML into analysis-ready, context-rich text segments.

Key Code Explanations

·         response = requests.get(url, timeout=15, headers={“User-Agent”: “Mozilla/5.0”})

This line performs the HTTP request to fetch the raw HTML of the target URL. The custom user-agent ensures that the request mimics a real browser, reducing the chance of blocks by certain websites. The timeout=15 prevents hanging if the server is unresponsive.

·         soup = BeautifulSoup(html_text, “html.parser”)

The raw HTML is parsed into a BeautifulSoup object for structured navigation and manipulation. This makes it possible to easily find and filter tags.

·         for tag in soup([“script”, “style”, “noscript”, “iframe”, “nav”, “header”, “footer”]): tag.decompose()

This block removes all non-content elements such as scripts, styles, navigation, and footers. These tags do not contribute to semantic meaning and often introduce noise.

·         if elem.name.startswith(“h”):

This condition updates the current_heading whenever a heading tag (h1–h6) is encountered. This heading context will be attached to subsequent content until a new heading is found.

·         if text and len(text.split()) > 5:

This ensures that only meaningful content blocks are captured. Fragments shorter than 5 words are ignored, preventing unnecessary noise (like very short list items or stray words).

·         blocks.append({…}) with block_id and position

Each block is stored with metadata:

• block_id: a unique identifier, incrementing with every captured block.
• heading: the last seen heading, providing context.
• content: the cleaned text of the block.
• tag: the type of HTML element (paragraph or list).
• position: numeric order to preserve document flow.

·         return {“url”: url, “blocks”: blocks}

Finally, the function outputs a dictionary containing the URL and its list of structured blocks, ready for further processing.

Function preprocess_blocks

Overview

The preprocess_blocks function is responsible for cleaning and standardizing text extracted from a webpage before it is used in downstream analysis. Raw extracted blocks often contain noise such as boilerplate text, promotional phrases, URLs, or formatting artifacts. This function ensures that only meaningful content remains, making later steps like embedding generation, clustering, or intent classification more reliable. It also enforces a minimum word count filter to remove extremely short blocks that rarely add value in SEO analysis.

From a business perspective, this function ensures that the textual data used for SEO insights reflects actual content rather than navigational links, disclaimers, or repetitive template phrases. By eliminating unnecessary elements, the function improves both the quality and trustworthiness of similarity, clustering, and semantic relevance checks—directly impacting the accuracy of actionable SEO recommendations.

Key Code Explanations

·         Base Patterns Setup

This defines a set of boilerplate phrases commonly found in webpages. These are irrelevant for SEO analysis and can skew similarity or embedding calculations. Optional user-provided patterns (boilerplate_extra) can also be added, giving flexibility to tailor the cleaning process for specific websites.

• Regex Compilation

The first regex removes boilerplate phrases regardless of capitalization, while the second targets URLs. This ensures content isn’t polluted with navigational text or links. From an SEO perspective, this means the analysis focuses purely on semantic text rather than link structures.

• Character Normalization and Substitutions

These substitutions standardize special characters, ensuring uniform text representation. For example, smart quotes and em-dashes are replaced with simpler equivalents. This is crucial because inconsistent characters can fragment embeddings or word tokenization, leading to inaccurate similarity comparisons.

• clean_text Inner Function

The nested function clean_text handles the actual string processing. It decodes HTML entities, applies Unicode normalization, removes boilerplate, strips URLs, applies substitutions, and finally trims whitespace. This step ensures every block is standardized before analysis.

• Minimum Word Count Filtering

Only blocks with enough words are retained. Very short blocks are often menu labels, button text, or noise. Filtering them increases the precision of relevance and similarity scoring, which is critical for SEO-driven insights.

Function chunk_block_text

Overview

The chunk_block_text function is designed to divide long text passages into smaller, more manageable overlapping chunks based on word count rather than token count. This ensures that each chunk remains semantically coherent and avoids exceeding model input limits during NLP tasks such as embedding generation, intent detection, or similarity scoring.

By using a word-based approach with adjustable parameters (max_words and overlap), this function ensures that large content blocks (e.g., long paragraphs or sections) can be processed effectively without losing context. The overlap parameter specifically helps maintain continuity between chunks, so key phrases and concepts are not cut off abruptly — an important consideration when applying transformer models that rely on sequential understanding.

Key Code Explanations

·         Splitting the text into words

words = text.split()

• The function begins by splitting the input text into individual words.
• Unlike tokenization (which depends on model-specific tokenizers), word splitting keeps the function simple, efficient, and model-agnostic.

·         Handling short text directly

• If the block is already shorter than the max_words limit, the function simply returns the entire text as one chunk.
• This avoids unnecessary processing for short inputs, keeping the function efficient.
• Iterative chunk creation

• A sliding window approach is used to create chunks.
• Each chunk includes up to max_words words, ensuring size uniformity.
• The chunks are built sequentially so that the entire input text is covered.
• Maintaining overlap for context

start = end – overlap

• Instead of moving directly to the next non-overlapping block, the function shifts the start index back by overlap words.
• This ensures that consecutive chunks share some common content, preserving semantic flow and preventing loss of key transitional words.

Function load_embedding_model

Overview

The load_embedding_model function is responsible for loading a pre-trained sentence embedding model. These embeddings are the foundation for many downstream tasks such as semantic similarity scoring, intent matching, clustering, and SEO-driven content alignment.

By default, the function loads the sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2 model, which is a widely used, lightweight, and efficient model optimized for semantic similarity. It balances speed and performance, making it ideal for large-scale SEO tasks where many sections, queries, or documents need to be compared.

Key Code Explanations

·         Model loading inside a try block

model = SentenceTransformer(model_name)

• This line attempts to load the specified model from the sentence-transformers library.
• If successful, the model is stored in memory and ready to generate embeddings for queries or content blocks.

Embedding Model: sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2

About

The “all-mpnet-base-v2 model is a high-performing embedding model developed within the Sentence-Transformers framework. It is widely used in production systems because it balances speed, memory efficiency, and semantic accuracy. The model is pre-trained and fine-tuned on a large set of tasks such as semantic textual similarity, making it highly capable of capturing meaning beyond just keywords.

Architecture

The model is based on Microsoft’s MiniLM architecture, a distilled version of larger Transformer models like BERT and RoBERTa. Specifically, it produces 384-dimensional embeddings. This smaller size allows it to generate high-quality semantic vectors while being fast enough for large-scale SEO applications without requiring heavy computational resources.

Features

The model powers several key features of the project. It allows robust section-level content alignment, ensuring each query or recommendation is matched with the most semantically relevant page content. It enables internal linking suggestions by identifying blocks with the highest contextual similarity to new recommendations. It provides a scalable foundation for query–content intent alignment, ensuring semantic gaps are highlighted and addressed. Most importantly, it makes the analysis practical at scale, as the embeddings are fast to compute, and memory-efficient. This combination ensures clients get accurate, real-world SEO insights without performance bottlenecks.

How It Works in This Project

In this project, the model is used to transform both page content blocks and recommendation texts into embeddings. These embeddings are dense vector representations that capture the semantic meaning of the text rather than just the surface words. Once generated, embeddings are compared using cosine similarity to measure how closely content aligns with queries or with internal linking opportunities. This process enables us to go beyond keyword matching and evaluate the true topical and contextual relevance of content, which is critical for SEO-driven recommendations.

Function compute_embeddings

Overview

The compute_embeddings function is a core utility for transforming raw text into dense numerical representations (embeddings) using a pre-loaded SentenceTransformer model. These embeddings act as the semantic backbone of the project: they capture contextual meaning beyond exact keywords, allowing the system to measure similarity, identify intent alignment, and group related content.

In an SEO context, this function enables advanced applications such as query-to-content alignment, content clustering, topical authority measurement, and detection of intent drift. Without embeddings, the system would be limited to surface-level keyword matching, which is insufficient for modern search engines that prioritize semantic relevance.

Key Code Explanations

·         Embedding generation

• model.encode: The main method that converts raw text into embeddings.
• batch_size=batch_size: Processes multiple texts in parallel, improving performance on large datasets.
• show_progress_bar=False: Keeps the pipeline clean during batch runs (useful for automation and client-facing environments).
• convert_to_numpy=True: Ensures embeddings are returned as a NumPy array, which is optimal for numerical operations like similarity scoring.
• normalize_embeddings=True: Normalizes embeddings to unit length, which is critical for cosine similarity to work consistently and comparably across different batches of texts.

Function compute_max_similarities

Overview

The compute_max_similarities function identifies the most relevant content match for each query by calculating cosine similarities between query embeddings and corpus embeddings. It returns two outputs: the maximum similarity score for each query and the index of the best-matching corpus element. This step is central to aligning user queries with the most contextually relevant parts of webpage content.

Key Code Explanations

·         util.cos_sim(query_embs, corpus_embs)

Computes cosine similarity between query embeddings (query_embs) and corpus embeddings (corpus_embs). The result is a similarity matrix where each row corresponds to a query and each column corresponds to a content block.

·         .cpu().numpy() / .numpy()

Handles conversion of the similarity tensor into a NumPy array. If the similarity result comes as a PyTorch tensor, it is first moved to CPU before converting. This ensures compatibility with NumPy operations regardless of the underlying library.

·         np.argmax(sims, axis=1)

Identifies the index of the highest similarity score for each query across all corpus embeddings. This represents the most relevant match.

·         sims[np.arange(sims.shape[0]), max_idxs]

Extracts the maximum similarity values corresponding to the best-match indices. This ensures each query is paired with both its highest score and the content block that produced it.

·         Return (max_vals, max_idxs)

Provides both the score of the strongest match (max_vals) and its location in the corpus (max_idxs). Together, these results help pinpoint the most relevant section of content for each query.

Function get_block_neighbors

Overview

The get_block_neighbors function identifies the most contextually related content blocks within a page by computing nearest neighbors for each block. This is particularly useful in SEO analysis where understanding how sections of content relate to one another can highlight topic clustering, redundancy, or opportunities for internal linking.

Key Code Explanations

·         util.cos_sim(corpus_embs, corpus_embs)

Calculates cosine similarity between every content block and all others in the same corpus. This produces a square similarity matrix where each row and column represents a block.

·         .cpu().numpy() / .numpy()

Ensures the similarity matrix is converted into a NumPy array, regardless of whether it originated as a PyTorch tensor. This standardization makes subsequent operations consistent.

·         row[i] = -1.0

Each block has perfect similarity with itself. To avoid returning self-matches as neighbors, the diagonal entry is set to -1.0, ensuring it is excluded from top results.

·         np.argsort(row)[-top_k:][::-1]

Sorts similarity scores for each block and retrieves the indices of the top k highest values (excluding self). The [::-1] reverses order so results are in descending similarity.

·         topk_vals = row[topk_idx]

Collects the similarity scores corresponding to the top neighbors. This preserves not just which blocks are related, but how strongly they are related.

·         neighbors.append((topk_idx.tolist(), topk_vals.tolist()))

For each block, stores a tuple containing:

• The indices of its top neighbor blocks.
• The similarity values for those neighbors.

Function extract_top_terms_from_texts

Overview

The extract_top_terms_from_texts function identifies the most significant terms from a collection of texts using a simple TF-IDF approach. In SEO contexts, this highlights the dominant keywords or key phrases driving topical relevance, helping assess whether content aligns with target queries or competitors.

Key Code Explanations

·         TfidfVectorizer(ngram_range=(1,2), max_features=1000, stop_words=’english’)

• Uses scikit-learn’s TF-IDF vectorizer to convert text into weighted term features.
• ngram_range=(1,2) means both single words (unigrams) and two-word phrases (bigrams) are included.
• max_features=1000 caps the vocabulary size for efficiency.
• stop_words=’english’ removes common English words (e.g., “the”, “and”) that don’t carry topical meaning.

·         X = vect.fit_transform(texts)

Fits the TF-IDF model on the provided texts and transforms them into a sparse matrix where rows = texts and columns = terms.

·         scores = np.asarray(X.sum(axis=0)).ravel()

Aggregates TF-IDF scores across all texts. This produces a single score per term that reflects its overall importance in the corpus.

·         terms = np.array(vect.get_feature_names_out())

Retrieves the actual vocabulary terms corresponding to each column in the TF-IDF matrix.

·         top_idx = np.argsort(scores)[-top_n:][::-1]

Sorts the aggregated term scores, selecting the indices of the top n terms, ordered from most to least significant.

·         return terms[top_idx].tolist()

Returns the list of top terms/phrases, which represent the strongest content signals across the input texts.

This output can be used to summarize topical coverage, identify missing themes, or check keyword alignment with search intent.

Function extract_rep_terms_semantic

Overview

The extract_rep_terms_semantic function identifies the most semantically representative terms or phrases within a block of text. Instead of just selecting keywords based on frequency or TF-IDF, it uses embeddings and clustering to group related terms and pick the strongest representatives from each group. This ensures the extracted terms reflect the deeper meaning and structure of the content, which is especially valuable for long-form or topic-rich texts.

The function:

1. Extracts candidate terms from the text (noun chunks and key nouns/proper nouns).
2. Generates embeddings for each candidate using a sentence-transformer model.
3. Applies clustering to group semantically similar terms.
4. Selects representative terms from each cluster, ranking them by cluster size (importance).
5. Returns the top representative terms based on semantic value.

This method provides a more context-aware and meaningful set of keywords than frequency-based approaches.

Key Code Explanations

·         Candidate term extraction:

• Extracts noun phrases (e.g., “search engine optimization”).
• Filters them to keep only meaningful multi-word phrases.
• Cleans punctuation and normalizes casing.

• Adds individual nouns and proper nouns as candidates.
• Uses lemmatization to ensure consistency (e.g., “strategies” → “strategy”).
• Embedding the candidates:

embeddings = embedding_model.encode(candidates, convert_to_numpy=True, normalize_embeddings=True)

• Converts candidate terms into dense vector embeddings.
• Normalization ensures similarity calculations are consistent across terms.
• Clustering candidates:

• Groups semantically similar terms together using Agglomerative Clustering.
• Converts similarity into distance (1 – sim_threshold).
• Each cluster represents a conceptually related set of terms.
• Selecting representative terms per cluster:

• Finds the centroid embedding of a cluster.
• Chooses the term closest to the centroid as the most representative one.
• Ranking terms by cluster size:

• Larger clusters = stronger representation in the text.
• Ensures that the top terms returned reflect the most dominant themes.

Function generate_candidate_topics

Overview

The generate_candidate_topics function builds a structured set of candidate topics from webpage sections by leveraging embeddings, TF-IDF, and term extraction methods. It operates in two main ways:

• Seed-gap candidates: Derived from the section most aligned with the user’s query, these serve as anchor suggestions.
• Low-density block candidates: Generated from areas of the content that lack semantic coverage, helping to identify expansion opportunities.

The function ensures candidates are deduplicated, filtered, and enriched with representative terms, making them directly usable in recommendation pipelines.

Key Code Explanations

·         Seed-gap candidate creation:

• If the block most similar to the query exists, representative terms are extracted semantically. This creates a candidate directly tied to the query intent.
• Fallback to TF-IDF:

• If semantic extraction fails, the function falls back to simple TF-IDF scoring, ensuring candidates are always populated with meaningful terms.
• Low-density block handling:

• This loop scans sections marked as sparse, generating candidates to highlight under-covered areas for topic expansion.
• Candidate structure:

• Each candidate contains a type, a short title hint, supporting evidence, representative terms, and similarity metrics, making it useful for downstream recommendation.
• Deduplication:

Candidates are deduplicated based on their representative term signature, ensuring the final list is clean and non-redundant.

Function generate_recommendation_from_candidate

Overview

The generate_recommendation_from_candidate function transforms a raw content opportunity candidate into a client-ready content brief. It uses heuristics and structured logic to suggest:

• A title (SEO and reader-friendly).
• A meta description (concise, intent-focused).
• Headings for structuring the content.
• A recommended content length.
• Representative terms to cover.
• Actionable steps for the content team.
• Supporting evidence (snippets).

This function is designed to output highly practical briefs that guide content writers in closing topical coverage gaps.

Key Code Explanations

·         Representative terms extraction

Collects topical terms related to the content gap. These drive headings, length estimation, and actionables.

• Title heuristics

• If the candidate is a “seed gap”, the title is kept query-style (e.g., “How to …”).
• Otherwise, it generates a guide-style title (e.g., “Keyword Research — Practical Guide”).
• Meta description generation

Creates a one-sentence meta description summarizing the topic coverage.

• Suggested headings logic

Headings are built either from representative terms or fallback defaults.

• Suggested length heuristic

Sets word count based on topical depth but keeps it bounded (500–2200 words).

• Actionables for writers

Outputs concrete steps the content team can execute.

• Estimated effort

est_hours = round(suggested_length / 400.0 * 1.2, 1)

Estimates time needed (research + writing), scaling with suggested length.

• Final brief assembly

 Produces a structured client-facing recommendation dictionary.

Function score_recommendation

Overview

This function assigns a priority score to a recommendation by combining three key evaluation factors:

• Novelty (how new/unique the recommendation is),
• Relevance (how well it aligns with the project or client objectives),
• Effort (how much work is required to implement it).

Each factor is weighted, and the combined score produces a priority value between 0 and 100. This makes recommendations more actionable by giving clients a clear, ranked sense of what to focus on first.

Key Code Explanations

·         Bounding Inputs

• Ensures all values stay between 0 and 1, preventing invalid scores.
• Score Calculation

• Novelty and relevance increase the score.
• Effort decreases it (since lower effort means higher priority).
• Final score is scaled to a 0–100 range for easier interpretation.

Function create_linking_plan_for_rec

Overview

The create_linking_plan_for_rec function generates an internal linking plan for a given recommendation. It works by embedding the recommendation text (title + representative terms) and comparing it with embeddings of content blocks from the website. Using cosine similarity (via dot product since embeddings are normalized), it identifies the top-k most relevant content blocks that can serve as anchor points for linking.

The output updates the recommendation dictionary (rec) by attaching a linking_plan, which includes details such as anchor text, block ID, URL, heading, snippet, and similarity score. This helps in determining where and how to insert internal links that support the recommendation.

Key Code Explanations

·         Embedding the Recommendation Text

The function computes the embedding of the recommendation text (title + representative terms). This produces a dense vector representation that can be compared with content block embeddings.

• Fallback for Robustness

If embedding the full recommendation text fails (due to malformed input or missing terms), it falls back to embedding only the title, ensuring the process does not break.

• Similarity Computation

• Since embeddings are normalized, the dot product gives cosine similarity. Any invalid values (NaN/Inf) are replaced with zero to keep the computation stable.
• Selecting Top-k Matches

top_idx = np.argsort(sims)[-top_k:][::-1]

This line sorts similarities in descending order and selects the indices of the top-k most relevant content blocks.

• Constructing the Linking Plan

Each selected block is transformed into a structured record with relevant linking metadata:

• anchor_text: derived from the block’s heading or start of its content.
• snippet: a preview of the block’s content for context.
• similarity: numerical relevance score with respect to the recommendation.

This structured linking plan helps content strategists identify the most relevant places to insert internal links for SEO impact.

Function run_pipeline

Overview

The run_pipeline function is the orchestrator of the entire system. It ties together all the helper functions—block extraction, preprocessing, chunking, embeddings, neighbor analysis, candidate generation, scoring, and linking plan creation—into one standardized, end-to-end pipeline.

Given a list of URLs and queries, it:

• Extracts and preprocesses content blocks from the URLs.
• Optionally chunks long blocks into smaller sections for granularity.
• Computes embeddings for all blocks.
• Calculates neighbor similarities and detects low-density blocks (potential coverage gaps).
• For each query, checks coverage, generates candidate topics, produces structured recommendations, scores them, and builds internal linking plans.
• Returns a structured dictionary containing diagnostics, recommendations, and metadata at both the URL and query level.

This function provides the final output for content strategists and SEO analysts: a prioritized, actionable set of content recommendations with evidence and linking suggestions.

Key Code Explanations

·         Embedding Model Initialization

Loads the sentence-transformer embedding model used throughout the pipeline to compute semantic embeddings.

• Block Extraction & Preprocessing

Extracts raw content blocks from the URL and preprocesses them into a structured form for analysis.

• Chunking Long Blocks

Splits long blocks into smaller overlapping segments for finer-grained semantic analysis. Each chunk is tracked with metadata (blk_uid, heading, etc.).

• Embedding All Blocks

Generates normalized embeddings for each block, enabling cosine similarity computations across content.

• Neighbor Analysis & Density Threshold

Each block’s average similarity to its neighbors is computed. Blocks below the density threshold are flagged as low-density blocks, signaling coverage gaps.

• Query Coverage Check

Determines if the query is well-covered by existing blocks. A low cosine similarity means a seed gap (poor coverage).

• Candidate Generation & Recommendations

• For each candidate topic:
  • Generates a structured content brief.
  • Scores it on novelty, relevance, and effort to prioritize.
  • Creates a linking plan from existing content.
• Sorting Recommendations

recs.sort(key=lambda r: r.get(“priority_score”, 0.0), reverse=True)

Ensures the final list of recommendations is ranked by priority score for actionable decision-making.

• Final Assembly

pipeline_results[url] = url_res

Stores both base diagnostics (embeddings, density scores, low-density blocks) and per-query recommendations for each URL.

Function display_pipeline_results

The display_pipeline_results function provides a client-facing overview of the project’s output in a clear and interpretable way. It processes the structured pipeline results for each page and query, then presents the findings in plain language. For every page, it shows how many content blocks were analyzed and highlights low-density areas that may indicate missed opportunities. For each query tested against the page, the function explains the level of content coverage, whether there is a seed gap, and displays the most relevant snippet of text found. It also highlights actionable recommendations, including priority scores, reasons why they matter, suggested headings, approximate content length, and potential internal linking opportunities. The function concludes with an executive summary that aggregates the number of queries processed, the total recommendations generated, and how many queries showed seed gaps. This ensures clients receive a balance of detailed insights and high-level takeaways that can guide their content strategy effectively.

Result Analysis and Explanation

Content Coverage Overview

The analysis shows that the page contains 122 blocks, with 19 identified as low-density areas, indicating potential gaps in detailed content coverage. For the query “How to handle different document URLs,” the coverage score is 0.4749, signaling a coverage gap and highlighting the need for additional focused content. The best matching snippet emphasizes canonical URL management, which shows some alignment with the query but confirms that critical aspects of handling different document URLs are not fully addressed. This presents a clear opportunity for content expansion.

Seed Gap Implications

A seed gap was detected for the query, which means the existing content does not sufficiently satisfy user intent or query coverage. This is crucial for SEO strategy, as addressing seed gaps ensures that content meets searcher expectations and strengthens topical authority. The system’s recommendations focus on bridging this gap by suggesting highly relevant topics derived from low-density and undercovered content blocks.

Recommendations and Their Practical Value

The system generated multiple high-priority recommendations to address the identified coverage gap. The top recommendation, “Final Tips — Practical Guide,” has a priority score of 80.04 and targets terms like “final tips,” “India,” and “marketing,” which are contextually important to the page’s topic. The recommended headings, such as “What is final tips?” and “How to implement India,” provide a clear structure for writers to develop comprehensive content. Internal linking suggestions identify existing blocks with moderate semantic similarity (0.4043–0.5100), which helps integrate new content seamlessly with the current page and boosts interlinking for better user navigation and SEO value.

The second recommendation, “Tips — Practical Guide,” also focuses on connecting underrepresented concepts such as “effective canonicalization” and aligns with the page’s primary topic. The priority score of 78.06 indicates high relevance and actionable value. The recommended headings and internal anchor suggestions ensure that content can be developed quickly while maintaining semantic consistency with existing blocks.

The third recommendation, “Required Fields — Practical Guide,” provides guidance on overlooked topics such as mandatory metadata fields and workflow steps. With a priority score of 77.93, this recommendation helps cover essential technical aspects that were previously underrepresented. Internal anchor suggestions link to relevant blocks, enabling efficient content integration.

Content Structure and Scope

All top recommendations suggest content lengths around 1,420 words, which is substantial enough to cover a topic comprehensively. The suggested headings provide a writer-ready framework that addresses the “what,” “why,” and “how” aspects of each topic. This ensures that content is not only created to fill gaps but also organized in a way that maximizes reader comprehension and search relevance.

Internal Linking and Integration Opportunities

The recommended internal anchors highlight existing blocks with moderate semantic similarity, allowing the new content to be connected naturally to relevant sections. This supports internal SEO strategies by distributing link equity and reinforcing topic clusters. For example, the recommendation “Final Tips — Practical Guide” identifies blocks like “Step 6: Monitor and Maintain SEO Performance” as linking opportunities, which ensures the new content integrates well with the existing structure.

Executive Summary

Overall, the analysis identifies a coverage gap for the query, with actionable recommendations designed to expand content, improve semantic coverage, and strengthen topical authority. One seed gap was detected and addressed by the recommendations. The page has multiple low-density areas that can be leveraged to enhance content relevance. Ten recommendations were generated, providing a roadmap for targeted content creation and internal linking, which together optimize both user experience and search engine visibility.

Result Analysis and Explanation

Content Coverage and Gaps

·         Understanding Coverage Scores: Coverage scores indicate how well your existing content addresses a given query or topic. A higher score (closer to 1.0) reflects strong coverage, meaning most user intents are already met. Medium-range scores suggest partial coverage, which highlights opportunities to expand existing sections, refine details, or reorganize content. Low scores signal significant gaps, indicating that new content must be added to fully satisfy the topic.

·         Practical Implications: Coverage analysis is not just a metric; it is a guide for prioritization. For example, if multiple queries have mid-range coverage scores, users should focus on expanding high-impact topics first to maximize authority. Conversely, very low coverage scores reveal areas where foundational content is missing, helping users decide which topics require immediate attention to prevent missed opportunities in search visibility.

·         Low-Density Block Identification: Pages often contain blocks of content that are thin or lack depth. Identifying these low-density areas helps users pinpoint where to enrich content, add examples, provide actionable guidance, or incorporate keywords naturally. This ensures that every section contributes meaningfully to overall coverage and user satisfaction.

Seed Gap Detection

·         What It Means: Seed gaps highlight topics or query intents that are completely missing from a page. Unlike partial coverage, seed gaps represent entirely absent foundational content. Addressing them is crucial to provide a complete user experience and ensure that pages are competitive in search rankings.

·         Practical Guidance: Users should treat detected seed gaps as high-priority areas for content creation. Filling these gaps not only improves the page’s relevance but also establishes a stronger topical authority in the subject domain. Even pages with otherwise strong coverage scores may underperform if seed gaps exist, as search engines expect a comprehensive treatment of the topic.

Best Matching Snippets

·         Purpose: Best matching snippets show which blocks of content are currently most aligned with a query. They provide insight into the effectiveness of existing content and help identify which areas perform well versus those that require improvement.

·         User Applications: By reviewing snippets, users can quickly identify partial or weak content and decide whether to expand the section, add new examples, or restructure information for clarity. This also helps in internal linking, ensuring that strong performing content supports weaker sections effectively.

Recommendations and Actionable Steps

·         Priority Scoring System: Recommendations are ranked based on novelty, relevance, and effort. Novelty measures how much unique value a new content block provides, relevance assesses alignment with user intent, and effort reflects the implementation cost or complexity.

·         Actionable Approach:

• High-priority recommendations should be tackled first, as they address key gaps and provide the largest potential improvement in coverage and authority.
• Medium-priority recommendations are opportunities for fine-tuning content, adding additional insights, or reinforcing related concepts.
• Low-priority recommendations are generally enhancements for completeness and can be scheduled for later stages of content optimization.

·         Guided Implementation: Each recommendation includes suggested headings, internal linking opportunities, and estimated word count. Users can directly use these recommendations as a content roadmap, ensuring that expansions are structured, consistent, and aligned with search intent.

Score Interpretation Guidelines

·         Coverage Score Thresholds:

• Strong Coverage: Above 0.75 — existing content satisfies most user intents, only minor refinements needed.
• Partial Coverage: Between 0.55 and 0.75 — content partially satisfies the query; expansion recommended to improve authority.
• Coverage Gap: Below 0.55 — significant content gaps exist; new content creation required for complete coverage.

·         Recommendation Priority Score (0–100):

• High Priority (75+): Directly addresses major content gaps; highest impact for topical authority.
• Medium Priority (50–74): Improves depth, fills secondary gaps, strengthens supporting content.
• Low Priority (<49): Minor enhancements, fine-tuning, or internal linking improvements.

These thresholds provide users with a practical framework to triage efforts efficiently and make strategic content decisions.

Visualization Insights

·         Coverage Score Plots: Show query coverage across multiple pages, making it easy to identify high-performing content and areas that need expansion. Users can visually compare which pages cover specific topics well and where gaps exist.

·         Top-K Similarity Score Distribution: These histograms reveal the density of high-quality content blocks that match query intent. Peaks indicate well-aligned content, while low-density regions highlight areas that could be enhanced.

·         Average Neighbor Similarity (Boxplots): Illustrates content consistency across sections. High neighbor similarity suggests cohesive, well-structured content, whereas low similarity points to fragmented or disconnected information, helping users target areas for restructuring.

·         Stacked Score Contribution Plots (Optional): Break down recommendation priority into novelty, relevance, and effort. Users can easily understand why certain recommendations are prioritized and allocate resources effectively, focusing on actions that maximize impact.

Executive Insights and Practical Takeaways

·         By combining coverage analysis, seed gap detection, snippet evaluation, and prioritized recommendations, users gain a comprehensive view of content performance. This multi-dimensional perspective highlights immediate gaps, areas for expansion, and high-impact opportunities to improve topical authority.

·         Visualization plots reinforce these insights by offering clear, intuitive representations of coverage, relevance, and block cohesion across multiple pages. Users can use these plots to quickly identify patterns, prioritize actions, and track improvements over time.

·         Implementing recommendations in a structured, prioritized manner ensures that content growth is both efficient and impactful. By systematically addressing gaps and enhancing existing content, users can improve search visibility, strengthen user engagement, and establish authoritative coverage across their topic domains.

·         Overall, the analysis empowers users with actionable intelligence, enabling them to make informed decisions, optimize content strategically, and continuously improve their website’s SEO performance.

Practical Action Guidance

For each topic analyzed:

·         Coverage: Identify whether the topic has strong coverage, partial coverage, or a coverage gap.

·         Seed Gaps: Note if foundational content is missing entirely.

·         Priority Score: Review the ranking of each recommendation to determine implementation urgency.

·         Recommended Actions:

• Add new content for topics with coverage gaps or seed gaps, including clear headings and structured explanations.
• Expand partial coverage sections with examples, related subtopics, and actionable guidance.
• Use high-performing snippets to anchor internal links to weaker sections, improving content cohesion.
• Allocate effort according to the recommendation priority, addressing high-impact items first.

This structured approach provides a hands-on, actionable roadmap for content optimization. It ensures systematic improvement of coverage, cohesion, and topical authority across all topics, helping to prioritize resources effectively and maximize content performance.

Q&A on Project Features and Actionable Insights

How does the analysis measure topic coverage, and how can this information be used to improve web content?

A comprehensive topic coverage analysis evaluates how thoroughly a page addresses the intended subject or query. It identifies areas that are well-covered versus those that are underrepresented or missing. By examining these coverage insights, it becomes clear which sections require additional explanations, examples, or supporting information. Using this feature, web content can be refined to fill gaps, ensuring that every aspect of a topic is addressed. This leads to more complete, authoritative pages that are better aligned with user intent and search engine expectations. Coverage insights allow prioritization of updates, so effort is directed toward areas with the highest potential impact on relevance and ranking.

What is the purpose of detecting seed gaps, and how should they be handled?

Seed gaps identify missing foundational content that serves as the base for understanding a topic. When such gaps exist, readers may struggle to grasp advanced details or related information. Addressing seed gaps involves adding introductory explanations, context-setting sections, or essential definitions. By resolving these gaps, pages become more accessible, increase reader comprehension, and strengthen topical authority. This ensures that the content flows logically, establishing a strong base before diving into complex or niche points.

How does the system identify low-density content areas, and what practical actions should be taken?

Low-density areas are sections of a page where information is sparse, underdeveloped, or lacks supporting details. Identifying these areas highlights specific points where content can be expanded to increase depth, clarity, and user value. Practical actions include adding case studies, examples, visuals, step-by-step guides, or detailed explanations. Strengthening low-density areas improves user engagement, reinforces content authority, and enhances overall topic coverage without unnecessary duplication of already strong sections.

How are priority recommendations generated, and how can they guide content updates?

Priority recommendations are calculated by combining coverage gaps, content relevance, and potential impact on user experience and topical authority. They help focus efforts on the most critical content improvements first. The actionable approach is to address high-priority recommendations by adding detailed content, optimizing existing sections, or creating new subtopics. This ensures that optimization efforts produce tangible benefits in terms of relevance, engagement, and topical completeness. Each recommendation includes suggested headings, content focus areas, and anchor linking opportunities to make implementation straightforward.

How does the project evaluate the contribution of different content aspects, and why is this useful?

The system considers multiple components, such as novelty, relevance, and implementation effort, to determine the contribution of each content element to overall content priority. This breakdown allows for informed decision-making on where to invest resources. For example, highly novel content that is also relevant but requires minimal effort can be prioritized for rapid improvement. Understanding the contributions helps in allocating effort efficiently, ensuring that content updates deliver maximum impact with minimal wasted resources.

What are the actionable benefits of improving coverage, addressing seed gaps, and following priority recommendations?

By systematically improving coverage, addressing seed gaps, and implementing prioritized recommendations, web content becomes more authoritative, coherent, and aligned with search intent. These actions enhance visibility in search results, improve reader comprehension, and increase engagement metrics such as time on page and content interaction. The process also strengthens internal linking opportunities, helping to distribute topical authority throughout a website. The cumulative effect is a site that provides higher value to readers and demonstrates stronger topical expertise to search engines.

How can this project’s features support structured content optimization across multiple pages?

The project provides a standardized methodology for analyzing coverage, identifying gaps, and recommending improvements across multiple pages and topics. This enables systematic content optimization where each page is evaluated using the same criteria, and actionable recommendations are generated for all identified gaps. Using this approach, multiple pages can be simultaneously enhanced, ensuring consistency, improved user experience, and stronger topical authority across a website. By applying the insights, every page becomes a more complete resource for the target audience.

How does internal linking analysis enhance content value and usability?

The project identifies potential internal anchor points for each recommendation, showing where new or expanded content can be linked from existing pages. Strategically using these internal links improves navigability, spreads topical authority across related pages, and enhances the user journey. Implementing suggested anchors ensures that related content is connected effectively, reducing dead ends and increasing the likelihood that visitors explore additional pages. This practical feature strengthens both usability and SEO performance simultaneously.

What is the practical advantage of reviewing content in terms of novelty and relevance for each recommendation?

By evaluating novelty, relevance, and effort for each content recommendation, it becomes possible to prioritize updates that will add the most unique value to a page. This prevents redundancy and focuses resources on areas where new insights, perspectives, or supporting content will have the greatest impact. Taking action on recommendations with high novelty and relevance ensures content differentiation from competitors and enhances the likelihood of achieving stronger search visibility and reader engagement.

Final Thoughts

The project delivers a systematic approach to analyzing and optimizing web content by evaluating how well pages address specific topics and queries. Through a detailed examination of content coverage, identification of seed gaps, and analysis of low-density areas, it highlights actionable insights to strengthen the completeness and coherence of content. The implementation also prioritizes recommendations based on relevance, novelty, and effort, providing a clear roadmap for refining existing content and adding high-value information where needed.

Visualization of results, including coverage distributions, similarity scores, and content neighborhood analysis, offers a practical understanding of content strengths and areas for improvement. These insights support informed decision-making, ensuring that each page achieves balanced coverage, cohesive topic flow, and optimal internal connectivity.

By leveraging these outputs, content can be systematically evaluated and enhanced to improve topical authority, reader comprehension, and alignment with user intent. The combination of coverage analysis, priority recommendations, and interpretability of content contribution ensures a robust, real-world framework for maintaining high-quality, comprehensive, and strategically structured web pages.

The project demonstrates a practical, actionable methodology for content assessment and enhancement, producing measurable insights that can directly improve the effectiveness and impact of web pages across a range of topics.

---

Tuhin Banik

Thatware | Founder & CEO

Tuhin is recognized across the globe for his vision to revolutionize digital transformation industry with the help of cutting-edge technology. He won bronze for India at the Stevie Awards USA as well as winning the India Business Awards, India Technology Award, Top 100 influential tech leaders from Analytics Insights, Clutch Global Front runner in digital marketing, founder of the fastest growing company in Asia by The CEO Magazine and is a TEDx speaker and BrightonSEO speaker.

Connect with ThatWare’s Social Channels 👉